Skip to content
https://siteworth.co

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
81
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
4
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
4 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Apache HTTP Server✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Transfer Efficiency
81% efficient
REVIEW
81% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 81%
An estimated 192 KB (19%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 192 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.05g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
81% efficient

Total waste: 192 KB (19% of page weight)

Unused JS 192 KB

0.05g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1001 KB
Theoretical minimum 808 KB
Potential savings 192 KB (0.05g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.28g CO2 per view
PASS
0.28g CO2 per view
Info::
0.28g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.0 MB, producing an estimated 0.28g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.05g, network 0.05g, end-user device 0.18g.
Got: 0.28g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 33.2 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 33.2 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 4155 smartphones.

0.28g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 83% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.0 MB

Your site
0.28g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.05g
Network
0.05g
End-user device
0.18g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 2.8 kg · Annual: 33.2 kg · ≈ 4155 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
95% cached
PASS
95% cached
Info::
95% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 46 KB (vs 1001 KB first visit). 49 of 56 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.26g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.28g)
First visit
1001 KB
Repeat visit
46 KB

95% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.26g CO2 per returning visitor

49 resources served from cache · 7 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
17th percentile
PASS
17th percentile
Info::
0.28g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 83% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 17th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.28g

17th percentile

Cleaner than 83% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 54% cleaner ✓
vs Target 45% cleaner ✓
A+
Web Font Weight Variants
2 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
2 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
2 font weight(s) loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
10 images, 227 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

10

Total Size

227 KB

10 missing dimensions 9 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback