Skip to content
https://fcbarcelona.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
56
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.70g CO2 per view
FIX
1.70g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.70g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 6.0 MB, producing an estimated 1.70g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.32g, network 0.29g, end-user device 1.09g.
Got: 1.70g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 204.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 204.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 25557 smartphones.

1.70g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 19% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 6.0 MB

Your site
1.70g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.32g
Network
0.29g
End-user device
1.09g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 17.0 kg · Annual: 204.5 kg · ≈ 25557 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Amazon Web Services✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
81th percentile
FIX
81th percentile
Warning::
1.70g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 19% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 81th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.70g

81st percentile

Cleaner than 19% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 184% more
vs Target 241% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
82% efficient
REVIEW
82% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 82%
An estimated 1111 KB (18%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 1111 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.31g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
82% efficient

Total waste: 1111 KB (18% of page weight)

Unused JS 1111 KB

0.31g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 6160 KB
Theoretical minimum 5049 KB
Potential savings 1111 KB (0.31g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 67 KB (vs 6160 KB first visit). 167 of 172 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.69g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 1.70g)
First visit
6160 KB
Repeat visit
67 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.69g CO2 per returning visitor

167 resources served from cache · 5 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback