Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-10 12:25 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
53.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 465ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (47ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (943ms). Fastly edge cache (MISS). 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
170ms
DNS 47ms · TLS 5ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
47ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 12ms
Singapore - Singapore
622ms
DNS 108ms · TLS 5ms
United Stated - New York
341ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 10ms
United States - Santa Clara
668ms
DNS 45ms · TLS 7ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
943ms
DNS 199ms · TLS 8ms
CDN: Fastly (MISS) · Avg TTFB: 465ms · Cache: max-age=300

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 11.8 MB (9.5 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 5

1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 15.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 15.6s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€765 investment → €5,355/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€765
8.5 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€5,355
€64,256/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+8299% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120,500,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5850.1 mo payback · +10884% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€45 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~24%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+24pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 15.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 13.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 578ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€765 8.5 developer hours at €90/hr
Quick wins
€45 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

€10,047,021 / month at risk ~€120,564,256 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120,500,000

ePrivacy DirectiveDSGVOEAA
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set BEFORE consent (CMP misconfigured)
    DSGVO: EUR 5,000 – EUR 10,000,000
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set BEFORE consent (CMP misconfigured)
    DSGVO: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set BEFORE consent (CMP misconfigured)
    ePrivacy Directive: EUR 5,000 – EUR 100,000,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    DSGVO: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • 20 of 22 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • 2 image(s) with generic alt text
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€5,352 /mo

+24.3pp bounce · ~2,433 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€2.22 /mo

30012.0 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~3.0 MB per page load
    Saves €2.22/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

43
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.98 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

15.64 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

578 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

7.44 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

15.99 s

Desktop

80
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

804 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.82 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.06 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.91 s

Categories

8
Avg score 77.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Adobe Experience Manager · 155 peers
You 79
·
Avg 72
+7 above average
0 50 100
Better than 98% of Adobe Experience Manager sites See full Adobe Experience Manager benchmark →
Adobe Client Data Layer · 83 peers
You 79
·
Avg 71
+8 above average
0 50 100
Better than 98% of Adobe Client Data Layer sites See full Adobe Client Data Layer benchmark →

Technology stack

Adobe Experience Manager, on Java, with Fastly CDN

15 technologies detected 5 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Adobe Analytics Adobe Experience Platform Launch Google Analytics Google Tag Manager Microsoft Clarity
CMS
Adobe Experience Manager
Framework
Adobe Client Data Layer 2.0.2 Glide.js HSTS Open Graph React ServiceNow Usercentrics
Runtime
Java
CDN
Fastly

All Detected Technologies (15)

Categories CDN Website https://www.fastly.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-served-by: cache-toj-leto2350026-TOJ

Java is a class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.

Categories Programming languages Website https://java.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a content management solution for building websites, mobile apps and forms.

Categories CMS Website https://www.adobe.com/marketing/experience-manager.html Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Adobe Client Data Layer is a framework of JavaScript objects on your site that contains all variable values used in your implementation.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://github.com/adobe/adobe-client-data-layer Detected by BeaverCheck

Glide.js is a dependency-free JavaScript ES6 slider and carousel.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://glidejs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

ServiceNow is a cloud computing platform to help companies manage digital workflows for enterprise operations.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.servicenow.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Usercentrics is a SaaS enterprise solution for Consent Management (CMP) that helps enterprise customers to obtain, manage and document the user consent.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://usercentrics.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Adobe Analytics is a web analytics, marketing and cross-channel analytics application.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.adobe.com/analytics/adobe-analytics.html Detected by BeaverCheck

Adobe Experience Cloud Launch is an extendable tag management solution for Adobe Experience Cloud, Adobe Experience Platform, and other applications.

Categories Tag managers Website https://docs.adobelaunch.com/getting-started Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-11140615971

Microsoft's Clarity is a analytics tool which provides website usage statistics, session recording, and heatmaps.

Categories Analytics Website https://clarity.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Adobe Client Data Layer) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

15 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.webasto.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/710a0349-39af-4fd6-9f63-9dbb1522f165)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/710a0349-39af-4fd6-9f63-9dbb1522f165"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.webasto.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.webasto.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (83)
  • · Page weighs 11.8 MB (9.5 MB transferred)
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+6

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (89)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Send Feedback