https://inmotionhosting.com
Sustainability
· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
74
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
4
PASS
1
INFO
0
Checks
61 PASS 4 REVIEW 1 FIX
DGreen HostingActionUnknownFIX
Green Hosting
ActionUnknown
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
BCO2 Per Page Load0.62g CO2 per viewREVIEW
CO2 Per Page Load
0.62g CO2 per view
0.62g CO2 per view
Info::
0.62g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.2 MB, producing an estimated 0.62g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.12g, network 0.11g, end-user device 0.40g.
Got: 0.62g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 74.9 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 74.9 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 9364 smartphones.
0.62g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 50% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.2 MB
Your site
0.62g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.12g
Network
0.11g
End-user device
0.40g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 6.2 kg · Annual: 74.9 kg · ≈ 9364 smartphone charges
BCarbon Budget50th percentileREVIEW
Carbon Budget
50th percentile
50th percentile
Warning::
0.62g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 50% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 50th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.62g
50th percentile
Cleaner than 50% of websites
✗ Above the median website
vs Median 4% more
vs Target 25% more
BTransfer Efficiency77% efficientREVIEW
Transfer Efficiency
77% efficient
77% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 77%
An estimated 526 KB (23%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 526 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.15g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
Total waste: 526 KB (23% of page weight)
Unused JS 526 KB
0.15g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 2257 KB
Theoretical minimum 1731 KB
Potential savings 526 KB (0.15g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
A+Repeat Visit Weight93% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
93% cached
93% cached
Info::
93% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 151 KB (vs 2257 KB first visit). 152 of 155 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.58g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.04g CO2 (first visit: 0.62g)
First visit
2257 KB
Repeat visit
151 KB
93% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.58g CO2 per returning visitor
152 resources served from cache · 3 resources re-downloaded
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.