Skip to content
https://adecco.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
72
GRADE
C
FIX
2
REVIEW
3
PASS
1
INFO
0
Checks
6
1 PASS 3 REVIEW 2 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Next.jsCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
54th percentile
FIX
54th percentile
Warning::
0.74g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 46% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 54th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.74g

54th percentile

Cleaner than 46% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 24% more
vs Target 48% more
B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.74g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.74g CO2 per view
Info::
0.74g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.6 MB, producing an estimated 0.74g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.14g, network 0.13g, end-user device 0.48g.
Got: 0.74g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 89.0 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 89.0 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 11126 smartphones.

0.74g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 46% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.6 MB

Your site
0.74g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.14g
Network
0.13g
End-user device
0.48g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 7.4 kg · Annual: 89.0 kg · ≈ 11126 smartphone charges
B
Transfer Efficiency
84% efficient
REVIEW
84% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 84%
An estimated 442 KB (16%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 442 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.12g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
84% efficient

Total waste: 442 KB (16% of page weight)

Unused JS 442 KB

0.12g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 2681 KB
Theoretical minimum 2239 KB
Potential savings 442 KB (0.12g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 42 KB (vs 2681 KB first visit). 87 of 88 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.73g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.74g)
First visit
2681 KB
Repeat visit
42 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.73g CO2 per returning visitor

87 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback