Skip to content
https://draft.blogger.com

Infrastructure

· 9 checks — DNS, redirects, IPv6, crawlability, URL variants, and domain intelligence rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
79
GRADE
C
FIX
2
REVIEW
3
PASS
4
INFO
0
Probed from Madrid, Spain
302 Found
Checks
9
4 PASS 3 REVIEW 2 FIX
F
Redirect Chain
Action
4 redirect(s), 377 ms total
FIX
4 redirect(s), 377 ms total
Warning::
4 redirects before reaching final URL
Each redirect adds latency. Try to minimize the chain to 1 hop.
Info::
Uses 302 (temporary) redirect
If permanent, use 301 instead.
Got: https://draft.blogger.com
Info::
Cross-domain redirect detected

https://draft.blogger.com

145 ms · HTTP/1.1

302

https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLogin...

77 ms · HTTP/1.1

302

https://draft.blogger.com/?bpli=1

57 ms · HTTP/1.1

302

https://draft.blogger.com/about?bpli=1

25 ms · HTTP/1.1

301

https://draft.blogger.com/about/?bpli=1

72 ms · HTTP/1.1 FINAL

#URLStatusTimeProtocolServer
1https://draft.blogger.com302145 msHTTP/1.1ESF
2https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLogin...30277 msHTTP/1.1ESF
3https://draft.blogger.com/?bpli=130257 msHTTP/1.1ESF
4https://draft.blogger.com/about?bpli=130125 msHTTP/1.1sffe
5https://draft.blogger.com/about/?bpli=120072 msHTTP/1.1sffe

See the visual redirect chain in the HTTP Probe tab →

Each redirect adds latency. Try to minimize the chain to 1 hop.

Why this matters

Redirect chain — each hop adds latency; combine into one redirect where possible.

Source: Google Search Central / web.dev

If permanent, use 301 instead.

Why this matters

302 (Found) is for genuinely temporary redirects — if this redirect is permanent, switch to 301 to preserve SEO equity.

Learn more

Search engines treat 302 as temporary, keeping the original URL indexed and not transferring full link equity to the destination. Use 301 (Moved Permanently) for permanent redirects (HTTP→HTTPS, www-vs-non-www, URL restructures).

Source: Google Search Central

D
CDN & Delivery
Action
No CDN detected
FIX
No CDN detected
Warning::
No CDN detected
A CDN can significantly improve load times for users around the world by caching content at edge nodes closer to them.
No CDN detected

Consider using a CDN to improve global delivery speed and reduce origin load.

B
DNS Records
1 A records, 23 ms lookup
REVIEW
1 A records, 23 ms lookup
Info::
Resolves to 1 IPv4 address(es)
Got: 74.125.133.191
Info::
Single A record — no DNS redundancy
Multiple A records provide failover if one server goes down.
Info::
Has 1 IPv6 (AAAA) record(s)
Got: 2a00:1450:400c:c07::bf
Warning::
CNAME record at zone apex
A CNAME at the zone apex can break MX and NS records. Use ALIAS/ANAME or A records instead.
Got: blogger.l.google.com
Info::
No NS records found
Info::
No MX records — email not configured via DNS
Info::
CAA records not checked
CAA record lookup requires a specialized DNS resolver. This check will be available in a future update.
Info::
No SPF record found in TXT records
SPF helps prevent email spoofing. Add a TXT record starting with 'v=spf1'.
Info::
DNS resolution time: 23 ms
Got: 23 ms
A74.125.133.191
AAAA2a00:1450:400c:c07::bf
CNAMEblogger.l.google.com
NS
MX
TXT
CAALookup not available with standard resolver
Resolved in 23 ms

Multiple A records provide failover if one server goes down.

Why this matters

Single A record means a single point of failure — if that IP goes down, your site is unreachable until DNS TTL expires.

Learn more

Add multiple A records for round-robin failover, or use a managed DNS provider with health-checked failover (Route 53, Cloudflare, NS1). Short TTL (60-300s) lets clients recover faster on outages.

Source: SRE practice / DNS architecture

A CNAME at the zone apex can break MX and NS records. Use ALIAS/ANAME or A records instead.

Why this matters

CNAME at the apex (example.com) breaks every other apex record (MX, TXT, NS) — DNS-protocol violation per RFC 1034.

Learn more

RFC 1034 forbids CNAME alongside other records at the same name. Some DNS providers offer ALIAS / ANAME / flattened-CNAME records that work around this — use those instead. Otherwise apex-level CNAME breaks email (no MX), domain ownership verification (no TXT), and more.

Source: RFC 1034

CAA record lookup requires a specialized DNS resolver. This check will be available in a future update.

Why this matters

Informational: CAA (Certification Authority Authorization) records weren't checked in this scan.

SPF helps prevent email spoofing. Add a TXT record starting with 'v=spf1'.

Why this matters

Without SPF, receiving servers can't validate sending IPs — your domain is easier to spoof in phishing.

Learn more

SPF complements DMARC. Both should be published. SPF records list authorized sending IPs (e.g., `v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all` for Google Workspace). After publishing, verify in Google Postmaster Tools or mxtoolbox.

Source: RFC 7208 (SPF)

B
Crawlability
robots.txt present, no sitemap
REVIEW
robots.txt present, no sitemap
Info::
robots.txt is present
Got: 495 bytes
Info::
No sitemap.xml found
A sitemap helps search engines discover and index your pages more efficiently.
Info::
robots.txt does not reference a sitemap
Add a 'Sitemap:' directive to robots.txt so search engines can discover your sitemap.

A sitemap helps search engines discover and index your pages more efficiently.

Why this matters

No sitemap.xml — Google relies on crawl-graph discovery alone, slowing indexing of deep or fresh URLs.

Learn more

A sitemap accelerates Google's discovery of new and updated content. Most CMSes auto-generate one; static-site frameworks need a build-step plugin. Reference it from robots.txt and submit in Search Console to confirm Google can fetch it.

Source: sitemaps.org / Google Search Central

Add a 'Sitemap:' directive to robots.txt so search engines can discover your sitemap.

Why this matters

robots.txt omits Sitemap: directive — crawlers must fetch /sitemap.xml by convention; reliable but missing the explicit hint.

Source: sitemaps.org

robots.txt 200 OK
Size 495 B Sitemaps referenced 0 User-agents * Blocking No — crawling allowed
# robots.txt for https://www.blogger.com

User-agent: *
Disallow: /blog_this.pyra
Disallow: /blog-this.g
Disallow: /comment.g
Disallow: /comment-iframe.g
Disallow: /comment/delete/
Disallow: /comment/frame/
Disallow: /comment/fullpage/
Disallow: /create-blog.g
Disallow: /delete-comment.g
Disallow: /email-blog/
Disallow: /email-page/
Disallow: /email-post/
Disallow: /email-post.g
Disallow: /followers.g
Disallow: /followers/
Disallow: /post-edit.g
Disallow: /rearrange
Disallow: /share-post.g

sitemap.xml No sitemap found

No sitemap found

Adding a sitemap helps search engines discover your pages.

B
TLS Certificate Expiry & Recommendations
61 days until leaf cert expires — 3 issues to address
REVIEW

Certificate validity

61
days left
0d 30d 60d 90d+

Recommended actions

  • Enable HSTS: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • Enable DNSSEC on your domain for DNS spoofing protection
  • Enable OCSP stapling on your TLS server to remove a CA roundtrip and protect user privacy
A+
IPv6 Readiness
IPv6 reachable (22 ms)
PASS
IPv6 reachable (22 ms)
Info::
IPv6 is configured and reachable at 2a00:1450:400c:c07::bf
Got: 22 ms connect
IPv6 Ready
AAAA Records 2a00:1450:400c:c07::bf Connection Reachable (22 ms)
A+
URL Variants
www/non-www, trailing slash, HTTP→HTTPS
PASS
www/non-www, trailing slash, HTTP→HTTPS
Info::
HTTP correctly 301-redirects to HTTPS

www / non-www

https://www.draft.blogger.com/
200https://draft.blogger.com/

HTTP → HTTPS

301http://draft.blogger.com/ https://draft.blogger.com/

Consistent

A
Domain Intelligence
blogger.com — via MarkMonitor Inc., 27 years, 2 months old
PASS
blogger.com — via MarkMonitor Inc., 27 years, 2 months old
Warning::
Domain expires in 61 days
Consider enabling auto-renewal to prevent accidental expiration.
Got: Expires Jun 22, 2026
Info::
DNSSEC is not enabled
DNSSEC protects against DNS spoofing attacks. While not required, enabling DNSSEC adds an additional layer of security. Contact your DNS provider to enable it.
Info::
Registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.
Warning::
Registrar lock is NOT enabled
The domain can be transferred without an unlock step. Enable registrar lock (clientTransferProhibited) in your registrar's control panel to protect against unauthorized or accidental transfers.
Domain expiry

EXPIRED

June 22, 2026

SSL certificate

61 days

Issued by Google Trust Services

Domain age

27 years, 2 months

Registered June 22, 1999

DNSSEC

Not enabled

Protects against DNS spoofing

Hosting

Unknown

2a00:1450:400c:c02::bf

Registrar

MarkMonitor Inc.

Unlocked 4 NS records
Expiry timeline
Today
+1 year
Domain expiry SSL expiry Danger zone (≤30 days)
Recommended actions
  • Domain has EXPIRED — renew immediately to avoid total site outage
  • Enable DNSSEC to protect visitors from DNS spoofing
  • Enable registrar lock (clientTransferProhibited) to block unauthorized domain transfers
Registrar MarkMonitor Inc.
Created June 22, 1999 (27 years, 2 months ago)
Expires June 22, 2026 (2 months)
Last Updated May 21, 2025
Name Servers ns1.google.com, ns2.google.com, ns3.google.com, ns4.google.com
DNSSEC Not enabled
Hosting
IP Address 2a00:1450:400c:c02::bf
Data source: rdap (0.2s)

Consider enabling auto-renewal to prevent accidental expiration.

Why this matters

Domain expiry approaching — renew immediately and ensure auto-renew + alerting are configured.

Source: ICANN renewal policy

DNSSEC protects against DNS spoofing attacks. While not required, enabling DNSSEC adds an additional layer of security. Contact your DNS provider to enable it.

Why this matters

Without DNSSEC, an attacker who can poison your DNS can hijack your domain — and SSL certs alone don't stop them.

Learn more

DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS records, preventing forged responses from poisoning resolver caches. Without it, an attacker who controls the network path can redirect your domain to a malicious server before any HTTPS handshake happens. Most modern registrars (Cloudflare, Google Domains, Route 53) enable it with one toggle.

Source: ICANN / RFC 4033

The domain can be transferred without an unlock step. Enable registrar lock (clientTransferProhibited) in your registrar's control panel to protect against unauthorized or accidental transfers.

Why this matters

Without registrar lock, an attacker who phishes your registrar credentials can transfer the domain in minutes — total brand hijack.

Learn more

Registrar lock (clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited, clientDeleteProhibited) requires extra verification before any transfer/update/delete. Every major registrar offers it free. Combined with 2FA on your registrar account, it's the strongest defense against domain hijacking.

Source: ICANN / domain-security best practice

A+
HTTP Probe Timing
Total 169 ms — DNS, TCP, TLS, TTFB, content transfer breakdown
PASS
DNS Lookup DNS Lookup — time to resolve the domain name to an IP address.
29 ms
TCP Connect TCP Connect — time to establish a TCP connection to the server.
22 ms
TLS Handshake TLS Handshake — time to complete the HTTPS encryption handshake.
24 ms
Time to First Byte Time to First Byte — how long the server takes to respond with the first byte of data.
169 ms
Total Time Total request time from DNS lookup through full response.
170 ms

Connection waterfall

DNS Lookup 29 ms TCP Connect 22 ms TLS Handshake 24 ms Server Processing 95 ms Content Transfer 0 ms
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback