Skip to content
https://strictmx.com

Content

· 9 checks — Internal links, mixed-content guards, Open Graph previews, and structured data rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
100
GRADE
A+
FIX
0
REVIEW
1
PASS
8
INFO
0
Checks
9
8 PASS 1 REVIEW
B
Brand Presence
Site-name consistency, favicon, social image, meta tags, schema, and contact signals
REVIEW

Brand Presence

Your brand name differs across channels — visitors see inconsistent identity.

B

80/100

Site name appears as

Page titleEmail deliverability audit: why your mail goes to spam
og:site_nameStrictMX
twitter:site
Organization.nameStrictMX

Inconsistent — names differ across channels

Brand assets

Favicon

15/15

covers multiple sizes, apple-touch-icon + SVG

Social share image

20/20

og:image + twitter:image set

Meta completeness

20/20

Organization schema

15/15

has name, logo + url

Contact info discoverable

5/10

mailto link

Findings

  • Brand name differs across channels — users see inconsistent identity
  • Consider adding contactPoint — helps appear in "contact us" rich results
  • Only partial contact info discoverable — consider adding a dedicated contact page or mailto/tel link

How consistently your brand appears across channels — shared link previews, structured data, favicon, contact info.

A+
Mixed Content
No mixed content detected — all resources use HTTPS.
PASS
No mixed content detected — all resources use HTTPS.
Info::
No mixed content detected — all resources use HTTPS
A+
Open Graph
Open Graph tags are well configured for social sharing.
PASS
Open Graph tags are well configured for social sharing.

Preview

strictmx.com

Email deliverability audit: why your mail goes to spam

Audit of your sending and receiving mail: SPF, DKIM, DMARC, reverse DNS, TLS, MTA-STS, DANE. Written report with prioritised fixes in 48h. €179, flat.

Preview quality · Twitter/X A+ · 100/100
  • twitter:card — summary_large_image
  • twitter:title — Email deliverability audit: why your mail goes to spam
  • twitter:description — Audit of your sending and receiving mail: SPF, DKIM, DMARC, reverse DNS, TLS, MTA-STS, DANE. Written report with prio...
  • twitter:image — https://strictmx.com/static/assets/og-home.png

STRICTMX.COM

Email deliverability audit: why your mail goes to spam

Audit of your sending and receiving mail: SPF, DKIM, DMARC, reverse DNS, TLS, MTA-STS, DANE. Written report with prioritised fixes in 48h. €179, flat.

Preview quality · Facebook A+ · 100/100
  • og:title — Email deliverability audit: why your mail goes to spam
  • og:description — Audit of your sending and receiving mail: SPF, DKIM, DMARC, reverse DNS, TLS, MTA-STS, DANE. Written report with prio...
  • og:image — https://strictmx.com/static/assets/og-home.png
  • og:type — website
  • og:url — https://strictmx.com/
  • og:site_name — StrictMX

Email deliverability audit: why your mail goes to spam

strictmx.com

Preview quality · LinkedIn A+ · 95/100

Description will be truncated (152 chars / 150 max)

  • og:title — Email deliverability audit: why your mail goes to spam
  • og:description — Audit of your sending and receiving mail: SPF, DKIM, DMARC, reverse DNS, TLS, MTA-STS, DANE. Written report with prio...
  • og:image — https://strictmx.com/static/assets/og-home.png
  • Description will be truncated on LinkedIn (152 chars, max 150)

    → Tighten og:description to ≤150 characters

strictmx.com

Email deliverability audit: why your mail goes to spam

Audit of your sending and receiving mail: SPF, DKIM, DMARC, reverse DNS, TLS, MTA-STS, DANE. Written report with prioritised fixes in 48h. €179, flat.

Preview quality · Slack A+ · 100/100
  • og:title — Email deliverability audit: why your mail goes to spam
  • og:description — Audit of your sending and receiving mail: SPF, DKIM, DMARC, reverse DNS, TLS, MTA-STS, DANE. Written report with prio...
  • og:image — https://strictmx.com/static/assets/og-home.png

Social preview quality

Averaged across Twitter/X, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Slack.

A+ · 98/100
FieldTwitter/XFacebookLinkedInSlack
og:title
og:description
og:image
og:type
og:url
og:site_name
twitter:card
twitter:title
twitter:description
twitter:image
A+
Open Graph / Twitter Card Depth
OG image dimensions and Twitter card configuration look healthy
PASS
OG image dimensions and Twitter card configuration look healthy
Info::
OG/Twitter Card depth is clean -- dimensions, card type, and inheritance all valid
A+
Structured Data
4 JSON-LD block(s) found — structured data is well configured.
PASS
4 JSON-LD block(s) found — structured data is well configured.
Info::
Missing recommended property "sameAs" for Organization
Adding "sameAs" can improve how search engines display your content.
Info::
Custom type "Service" — unable to validate specific properties
Info::
4 JSON-LD blocks found

Adding "sameAs" can improve how search engines display your content.

Why this matters

Recommended schema properties unlock richer SERP layouts — without them you get the basic rich result instead of the enhanced one.

Learn more

Recommended properties expand what Google can render. E.g., adding aggregateRating to Product unlocks star ratings; adding image to Article unlocks the image-card variant. Each recommended property is a direct SERP-real-estate gain.

Source: Google Search Central / schema.org

JSON-LD Blocks

Block 1 : Service
7 properties Valid
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Service",
  "areaServed": "Worldwide",
  "name": "Mail health audit",
  "offers": {
    "@type": "Offer",
    "price": "179",
    "priceCurrency": "EUR",
    "url": "https://strictmx.com/"
  },
  "provider": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "StrictMX",
    "url": "https://strictmx.com/"
  },
  "serviceType": "Email deliverability and mail security audit"
}
Block 2 : FAQPage
3 properties Valid
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Not as part of the audit. The report tells you exactly what to change, with the record values ready to paste, and most people apply it themselves in an afternoon. If you would rather not, there is a fix session: we work through your report on a call, you make each change, and I verify your mail authenticates before we finish. You keep your own passwords."
      },
      "name": "Will you fix it for me?"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Yes. ESP setups have their own failure modes: alignment against a custom return-path, a subdomain with no DMARC policy of its own, a second sending service missing from your SPF record. Your provider's dashboard covers their side of the handoff and stops there."
      },
      "name": "I use Google Workspace / SES / Postmark — is this for me?"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Especially. I self-host my own mail on OpenSMTPD and Stalwart, and self-hosted stacks are most of the hard cases. Which MTA you run makes little difference: Postfix, Exim, Stalwart, something exotic. The audit works at the DNS, protocol, and reputation level, which is the same for everyone."
      },
      "name": "I self-host — is this for me?"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Almost certainly, and it almost doesn't matter. SPF, DKIM, DMARC, PTR, TLS, MTA-STS and reputation live in DNS and on the wire, not inside your MTA. The report gives you exact records and settings to change, and where a fix is MTA-specific I'll reference your server's actual configuration directives."
      },
      "name": "Do you know my specific mail server?"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "The intake form: your domain(s), your sending stack, the symptom, and the full headers of one affected message. No server access, no credentials, no DNS delegation."
      },
      "name": "What do you need from me?"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "A free checker lists what fails. It can't read your rejected message's headers, and it can't rank nine warnings by which one costs you delivery."
      },
      "name": "Why not a free checker?"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "From the completed intake, not from payment. If something is missing I'll ask once, and the clock starts when you answer."
      },
      "name": "48 hours from when?"
    }
  ]
}
Block 3 : Organization
12 properties Valid
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@id": "https://strictmx.com/#organization",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "address": {
    "@type": "PostalAddress",
    "addressCountry": "EE",
    "streetAddress": "Sepapaja tn 6, Lasnamäe, 11415 Tallinn, Estonia"
  },
  "description": "Fixed-price email deliverability and mail security audits.",
  "email": "mailto:audit@strictmx.com",
  "identifier": "14133549",
  "legalName": "Rapid Ventures OÜ",
  "logo": "https://strictmx.com/static/assets/favicon-32.png",
  "name": "StrictMX",
  "url": "https://strictmx.com/",
  "vatID": "EE101917160"
}
Block 4 : Person
10 properties Valid
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@id": "https://strictmx.com/about#person",
  "@type": "Person",
  "email": "mailto:audit@strictmx.com",
  "image": "https://strictmx.com/static/assets/philippe-namias.jpg",
  "jobTitle": "Email deliverability and mail security consultant",
  "knowsAbout": [
    "Email deliverability",
    "SPF",
    "DKIM",
    "DMARC",
    "MTA-STS",
    "TLS-RPT",
    "DANE",
    "DNSSEC",
    "Mail transport security",
    "Postfix",
    "Exim",
    "OpenSMTPD",
    "Stalwart Mail Server",
    "rspamd"
  ],
  "name": "Philippe Namias",
  "url": "https://strictmx.com/about",
  "worksFor": {
    "@id": "https://strictmx.com/#organization",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "Rapid Ventures OÜ"
  }
}
A+
Rich Results Eligibility
4 JSON-LD block(s) declaring 4 schema type(s)
PASS
4 JSON-LD block(s) declaring 4 schema type(s)
Info::
4 rich-result schema type(s) declared
Inventory of structured-data types on the page (each may unlock a different SERP feature): FAQPage, Organization, Person, Service Search engines decide whether to render rich results based on content quality + page-level signals; declaring the schema is necessary but not sufficient.
A+
Image Optimization
No images to analyze
PASS
No images to analyze
A+
Autoplay Media
No autoplay media on the page
PASS
No autoplay media on the page
Info::
No autoplay media on the page
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback