Brazil · Sao Paulo Completed: Apr 20, 2026 07:56 UTCScore: 59 / 100
Based on 4 categories, 27 sections
Good foundation, but a few gaps could be exploited.
Major barriers for users with disabilities — up to 15% of your audience.
Good server performance with room for optimization.
Several regulatory requirements are not yet met.
The overall score is a weighted average of individual category scores. Categories with more impact on user experience and security carry more weight.
Weights reflect general web best practices. Individual needs may differ.
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
No favicon or icon links detected
Accessibility issues exclude users with disabilities — up to 15% of your potential audience.
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
High impact, low effort — start here.
High impact, requires investment.
Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/84a8cee8-dea9-4138-a75e-7893105d45e2)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/84a8cee8-dea9-4138-a75e-7893105d45e2"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FMYMOONOVA.COM" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FMYMOONOVA.COMThis badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~21%.
No Content-Security-Policy header
+1% bounceHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
Fix: Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
No viewport meta tag
+15% bounceMobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
Fix: Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
€280 investment → €0.00/month returns + EUR 20,000,000 risk avoided
€280
4h · 5 findings
€0.00 /mo
~€0.00 / year
EUR 20,000,000
if kept compliant
€160 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
3.5 developer hours at €80/hr
Based on France rates (€80/hr)
Start here for the best return on investment
€1,666,667 / month at risk
~€20,000,000 / year if left unfixed
€20,000,000
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Thanks for your feedback!
We'll use a cached audit if available, or offer to scan.
Industry-standard audits powered by Google Lighthouse.
Key metrics that affect user experience.
Desktop audit not available for this result.
Send Feedback