Accessibility
· 13 checks — Landmarks, headings, alt text, forms, and link quality rolled into one auditable list.DHeading HierarchyAction10 headings, 4 skip(s)FIX
- H1 言葉からつながるネットの話題
- H2 はてなブログ タグ とは?
- H4 たとえばこんなタグをチェック! skipped
- H3 意味を知る
- H5 今後登場タグ説明の編集が可能に! skipped
- H3 意見や感想を知る
- H5 はてなブログを書けば、もっと楽しめる! skipped
- H3 同じテーマの記事とつながる
- H2 よくある質問
- H4 そのほかのご質問・お問い合わせは skipped
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
F404 Error PageActionSoft 404 detectedFIX
The server returned HTTP 200 for a non-existent path. Search engines will index this page as real content. Configure your server to return HTTP 404 for missing pages.
FWeb ManifestActionInvalid JSONFIX
Manifest contains invalid JSON.
DDark Mode SupportActionNo dark mode signalsFIX
Detection limited to meta tags and inline styles.
DPrint StylesheetActionNo print stylesFIX
CLandmark StructureAction8 landmarksREVIEW
Screen reader users cannot quickly navigate to the primary content. Wrap your main content in <main>.
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
Learn more ▾ ▴
The <main> element marks the page's primary content area. Assistive tech offers a 'jump to main' shortcut — but only if <main> exists. Without it, every page navigation forces re-reading the header. Wrap your primary content in a single <main>.
Source: WAI-ARIA / WCAG 2.4.1
Add a skip link as the first focusable element so keyboard users can bypass repeated navigation.
Without a skip-nav link, keyboard users tab through every nav item before reaching content — every page, every visit.
Learn more ▾ ▴
WCAG 2.4.1 (Bypass Blocks) requires a mechanism to skip past repeated content. The standard implementation is a 'Skip to main content' link that's the first focusable element, visually hidden until focused. Three lines of HTML + four of CSS.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 2.4.1
CFavicon & BrandingAction4 icon(s) detectedREVIEW
BLighthouse Accessibility AuditsScore 86/100 — 3 failing, 10 passedREVIEW
Accessibility
These checks highlight opportunities to improve the accessibility of your web app. Automatic detection can only detect a subset of issues and does not guarantee the accessibility of your web app, so manual testing is also encouraged.
Navigation
Properly ordered headings that do not skip levels convey the semantic structure of the page, making it easier to navigate and understand when using assistive technologies. Learn more about heading order.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
たとえばこんなタグをチェック! div.sc-hAcGzb > div.sc-kYHfwS > section#intro > h4 |
今後登場
タグ説明の編集が可能に! section.sc-dtDOqo > div > div.sc-uojGG > h5 |
はてなブログを書けば、もっと楽しめる! section.sc-dtDOqo > div > header > h5 |
そのほかのご質問・お問い合わせは div.sc-hAcGzb > div.sc-kYHfwS > section.sc-jHkVzv > h4 |
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Internationalization and localization
If a page doesn't specify a `lang` attribute, a screen reader assumes that the page is in the default language that the user chose when setting up the screen reader. If the page isn't actually in the default language, then the screen reader might not announce the page's text correctly. Learn more about the `lang` attribute.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
html html |
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Best practices
One main landmark helps screen reader users navigate a web page. Learn more about landmarks.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
html html |
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
AAlt Text QualityAll 9 images OKPASS
| Issue | Count |
|---|---|
| too long | 3 image(s) |
A+Form AccessibilityAll 4 controls labeledPASS
| Control | Type | Label | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| #q0 | checkbox | すでにカテゴリーを使って自分のブログ記事を分類しています。タグはどう使い分けたらよいですか? | for/id |
| #q1 | checkbox | 興味のあるブログを探す機能として「はてなブログ グループ」がありますが、どう使い分けたらよいですか? | for/id |
| #q2 | checkbox | はてなキーワードをもとにしたサービスなのに、サービス名や機能が「キーワード」ではなく「タグ」なのはどうしてですか? | for/id |
| #q3 | checkbox | ガイドラインに違反しているページを見つけました | for/id |
A+Link & Button Quality14 links, 0 buttons — all OKPASS
A+Color Contrast (Screenshot)20 text elements analyzed, 0 fail WCAG AAPASS
Analyzes text contrast against the actual rendered page, including background images, gradients, and overlays that CSS-based tools cannot detect.
Show all checked elements (20)
| Element | Ratio | Required | FG | BG | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| h1 言葉からつな… | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h1 ネットの話題 | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h2 はてなブログ … | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h2 よくある質問 | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h3 意味を知る | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h3 意見や感想を… | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h3 同じテーマの… | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| title はてなブログ … | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a はてなブログ … | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a よくある質問 | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| p 「同じ興味の… | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| strong はてなブログ … | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| p の出番。言葉… | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| p はてなブログ … | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h4 たとえばこん… | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a 仮面ライダー | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a VTuber | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a 萩尾望都 | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a ノーベル賞 | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a プリキュア | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
Methodology: The top 20 text elements by font size were checked. Background color was sampled from the desktop screenshot using a 5-point pattern. WCAG 2.1 AA requires 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text.