Skip to content
https://selectel.ru

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
66
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.31g CO2 per view
FIX
1.31g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.31g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.6 MB, producing an estimated 1.31g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.24g, network 0.23g, end-user device 0.84g.
Got: 1.31g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 156.7 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 156.7 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 19585 smartphones.

1.31g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 30% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.6 MB

Your site
1.31g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.24g
Network
0.23g
End-user device
0.84g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 13.1 kg · Annual: 156.7 kg · ≈ 19585 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
70th percentile
FIX
70th percentile
Warning::
1.31g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 30% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 70th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.31g

70th percentile

Cleaner than 30% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 118% more
vs Target 161% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
87% efficient
REVIEW
87% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 87%
An estimated 601 KB (13%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 601 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.17g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
87% efficient

Total waste: 601 KB (13% of page weight)

Unused JS 601 KB

0.17g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4721 KB
Theoretical minimum 4119 KB
Potential savings 601 KB (0.17g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 146 KB (vs 4721 KB first visit). 281 of 283 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.27g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.04g CO2 (first visit: 1.31g)
First visit
4721 KB
Repeat visit
146 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.27g CO2 per returning visitor

281 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback