Skip to content
https://tft-couverture.fr

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
73
GRADE
C
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.28g CO2 per view
FIX
1.28g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.28g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.5 MB, producing an estimated 1.28g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.24g, network 0.22g, end-user device 0.82g.
Got: 1.28g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 153.0 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 153.0 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 19127 smartphones.

1.28g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 31% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.5 MB

Your site
1.28g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.24g
Network
0.22g
End-user device
0.82g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 12.8 kg · Annual: 153.0 kg · ≈ 19127 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
69th percentile
FIX
69th percentile
Warning::
1.28g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 31% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 69th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.28g

69th percentile

Cleaner than 31% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 113% more
vs Target 155% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
PASS
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 14 KB (vs 4610 KB first visit). 35 of 36 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.27g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 1.28g)
First visit
4610 KB
Repeat visit
14 KB

100% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.27g CO2 per returning visitor

35 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
93% efficient
PASS
93% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 93%
Only 341 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
93% efficient

Total waste: 341 KB (7% of page weight)

Unused JS 341 KB

0.09g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4610 KB
Theoretical minimum 4269 KB
Potential savings 341 KB (0.09g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
15 images, 386 KB total, 335 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

15

Total Size

386 KB

Oversized

2

Wasted

335 KB

2 missing dimensions 14 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback