Skip to content
https://brazzers.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
68
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.30g CO2 per view
FIX
1.30g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.30g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.6 MB, producing an estimated 1.30g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.24g, network 0.22g, end-user device 0.83g.
Got: 1.30g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 155.9 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 155.9 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 19483 smartphones.

1.30g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 31% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.6 MB

Your site
1.30g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.24g
Network
0.22g
End-user device
0.83g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 13.0 kg · Annual: 155.9 kg · ≈ 19483 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
69th percentile
FIX
69th percentile
Warning::
1.30g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 31% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 69th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.30g

69th percentile

Cleaner than 31% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 116% more
vs Target 160% more
C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
73% efficient
REVIEW
73% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 73%
An estimated 1274 KB (27%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 1274 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.35g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
73% efficient

Total waste: 1274 KB (27% of page weight)

Unused JS 1274 KB

0.35g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4696 KB
Theoretical minimum 3421 KB
Potential savings 1274 KB (0.35g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
93% cached
PASS
93% cached
Info::
93% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 316 KB (vs 4696 KB first visit). 117 of 118 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.21g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.09g CO2 (first visit: 1.30g)
First visit
4696 KB
Repeat visit
316 KB

93% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.21g CO2 per returning visitor

117 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Web Font Weight Variants
3 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
3 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
3 font weight(s) loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
14 images, 0 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

14

Total Size

0 KB

Oversized

5

14 missing dimensions 7 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback