Skip to content
https://dataprivacyframework.gov

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
71
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
2
INFO
0
Checks
6
2 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Azure: Microsoft is carbon-negative; Azure renewable varies by region
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting AzureCDN Not identified

Azure: Microsoft is carbon-negative; Azure renewable varies by region

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Carbon Budget
34th percentile
REVIEW
34th percentile
Info::
0.44g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 66% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 34th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.44g

34th percentile

Cleaner than 66% of websites

Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 26% cleaner ✓
vs Target 12% cleaner ✓
C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
71% efficient
REVIEW
71% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 71%
An estimated 467 KB (29%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 467 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.13g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
71% efficient

Total waste: 467 KB (29% of page weight)

Unused JS 467 KB

0.13g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1599 KB
Theoretical minimum 1132 KB
Potential savings 467 KB (0.13g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.44g CO2 per view
PASS
0.44g CO2 per view
Info::
0.44g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.6 MB, producing an estimated 0.44g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.08g, network 0.08g, end-user device 0.28g.
Got: 0.44g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 53.1 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 53.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6636 smartphones.

0.44g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 66% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.6 MB

Your site
0.44g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.08g
Network
0.08g
End-user device
0.28g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.4 kg · Annual: 53.1 kg · ≈ 6636 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
PASS
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 1 KB (vs 1599 KB first visit). 33 of 34 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.44g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.44g)
First visit
1599 KB
Repeat visit
1 KB

100% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.44g CO2 per returning visitor

33 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback