Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.

SCORE

GRADE

FIX

REVIEW

PASS

INFO

Device:

Mobile Desktop

Checks

2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX

CO2 Per Page Load

Action

0.99g CO2 per view

FIX

0.99g CO2 per view

0.99g CO2 per page view

This page transfers 3.5 MB, producing an estimated 0.99g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.18g, network 0.17g, end-user device 0.63g.

Got: 0.99g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)

At 10,000 monthly views: 118.5 kg CO2/year

With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 118.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 14815 smartphones.

0.99g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 39% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.5 MB

Your site

0.99g

Top 10%

0.20g

Target

0.50g

Median website

0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center

0.18g

Network

0.17g

End-user device

0.63g

At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 9.9 kg · Annual: 118.5 kg · ≈ 14815 smartphone charges

Green Hosting

Action

Unknown

FIX

Unknown

Hosting provider could not be identified

Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.

Green hosting status based on known provider commitments

Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.

Green HostingUnable to Determine

Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

Carbon Budget

Action

61th percentile

FIX

61th percentile

0.99g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)

Heavier than an estimated 39% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.

Estimated 61th percentile

Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.

Top 10%

Target

Median website

0.99g

61st percentile

Cleaner than 39% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 65% more

vs Target 98% more

Web Font Weight Variants

Action

21 font weights loaded across 5 famil(y/ies)

REVIEW

21 font weights loaded across 5 famil(y/ies)

21 font weights loaded -- likely 100+ KB of unused payload

Loading 21 font weights typically transfers 200-400 KB just for fonts. Most pages legitimately use 2-3 weights (regular + bold, maybe medium). Audit which weights your stylesheet actually applies and trim the Google Fonts URL accordingly. Affected families: Cairo, Outfit, Playfair Display, Plus Jakarta Sans, Tajawal.

Green Hosting

Action

Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure

REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+

Repeat Visit Weight

99% cached

PASS

99% cached

99% reduction on repeat visits

Returning visitors download only 27 KB (vs 3571 KB first visit). 37 of 39 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.98g CO2 per repeat visit.

Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.99g)

First visit

3571 KB

Repeat visit

27 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.98g CO2 per returning visitor

37 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+

Transfer Efficiency

100% efficient

PASS

100% efficient

Transfer efficiency: 100%

Only 0 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.

Actual transfer 3571 KB

Theoretical minimum 3571 KB

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization

65 images, 3549 KB total, 2521 KB wasted

INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

Total Size

3549 KB

Oversized

Wasted

2521 KB

65 missing dimensions 9 missing lazy loading

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.