Security
· 32 checks — HTTP headers, CSP, TLS handshake, and cookie hygiene rolled into one auditable list.FEmail SecurityActionno DMARC, no SPFFIX
No DMARC record found
Without DMARC, email receivers have no policy for handling authentication failures from your domain.
Without DMARC, email receivers have no policy for handling authentication failures. Add a TXT record at _dmarc.<domain> starting with v=DMARC1.
Without DMARC, anyone can send phishing emails using your domain name.
Learn more ▾ ▴
DMARC tells receiving mail servers what to do with email that fails SPF/DKIM checks for your domain. With a strict 'p=reject' policy, spoofed emails get bounced; without it they reach the inbox. Domains used in phishing campaigns lose deliverability and brand trust fast.
Source: DMARC.org / NIST
Without SPF (Sender Policy Framework), receivers can't tell which servers are authorized to send mail for your domain. Add a TXT record at the apex starting with v=spf1, ending in -all.
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
DKIM signs outbound mail to prove origin. We probed common selectors (default, google, selector1, etc.) without finding a record. If you use a non-standard selector, this is a false negative.
No DKIM signature on outbound mail — receivers can't cryptographically prove the message came from your domain.
Learn more ▾ ▴
DKIM signs outbound mail with a private key whose public half lives in DNS at <selector>._domainkey.<domain>. Without DKIM, DMARC alone can't tell legitimate mail from spoofs, and large mailbox providers (Gmail, Yahoo) increasingly require DKIM for inbox placement. Note: this check probes a curated list of common selectors; non-standard selectors produce a false negative.
Source: RFC 6376 / Google + Yahoo 2024 sender requirements
MTA-STS forces inbound mail to use TLS, preventing downgrade attacks. Requires both a TXT record at _mta-sts.<domain> and a policy file at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt.
Without MTA-STS, inbound mail can be silently downgraded to plain SMTP by a network attacker.
Learn more ▾ ▴
MTA-STS (RFC 8461) tells sending mail servers to use TLS and to refuse delivery if TLS fails. Requires both a TXT record at _mta-sts.<domain> AND a policy file at https://mta-sts.<domain>/.well-known/mta-sts.txt. Without it, an active attacker on the network path can strip STARTTLS and read the email in plaintext.
Source: RFC 8461
TLS-RPT (RFC 8460) lets MTAs report TLS-handshake failures, so you can detect and fix MTA-STS misconfigurations. Add a TXT record at _smtp._tls.<domain>.
Without TLS-RPT, you have no visibility into inbound TLS failures — MTA-STS misconfigurations stay hidden until users complain.
Learn more ▾ ▴
TLS-RPT (RFC 8460) is the feedback channel for MTA-STS: senders post aggregate reports of TLS-handshake failures to the URI in your _smtp._tls TXT record. Without it, an MTA-STS misconfiguration silently rejects mail and you find out only when someone notices missing email.
Source: RFC 8460
BIMI (Brand Indicators for Message Identification) lets supporting clients (Gmail, Apple Mail, Yahoo) display your verified logo next to your messages. Optional but raises trust signals. Requires DMARC at p=quarantine or p=reject to be honored.
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
BContent Security Policy5 of 10 CSP checks passedREVIEW
Without base-uri, attackers can inject a <base> tag to hijack relative URLs. Set it to 'self' or 'none'.
base-uri 'self'Missing base-uri in CSP leaves a base-tag injection attack path open even on otherwise strict policies.
Learn more ▾ ▴
A common omission: developers add CSP for script-src and frame-ancestors but forget base-uri. The result is a CSP that looks strict but lets an attacker rewrite every URL on the page via <base href>. Add `base-uri 'self'` to close the gap.
Source: MDN CSP
frame-ancestors controls who can embed your page, preventing clickjacking. Set it to 'self' or 'none'.
frame-ancestors 'self'Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
form-action restricts where forms can submit data, preventing form hijacking.
form-action 'self'Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
This directive upgrades HTTP resources to HTTPS automatically, preventing mixed content.
upgrade-insecure-requestsWithout upgrade-insecure-requests, any HTTP subresource link survives as a mixed-content warning instead of auto-upgrading.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Adding `upgrade-insecure-requests` to your CSP turns every http:// subresource fetch into https:// at the browser layer. One-line defense against accidental mixed content from legacy links or third-party widgets.
Source: MDN CSP
Parsed Policy
BWAF / Bot ProtectionNo WAF detected via response headersREVIEW
Bsecurity.txtVulnerability disclosure policyREVIEW
security.txt
BTrusted Types (XSS Sink Hardening)Trusted Types not enabledREVIEW
BPermissions-Policy Granularity50% high-risk feature coverage (5/10)REVIEW
CSource Map ExposureAction1 publicly-accessible source map(s) -- full source code leakedREVIEW
BCORS ConfigurationNo CORS headersREVIEW
No CORS headers detected.
Cross-origin requests are blocked by browser same-origin policy.
Origin reflection test
Some servers mirror the request Origin header, which can be exploited. Test manually:
curl -sI -H "Origin: https://evil.com" <url> | grep -i access-control
A+Security Headers10 of 10 headers properly configuredPASS
Submit your domain to hstspreload.org to close the trust-on-first-use gap. Requires a preload-ready HSTS header (max-age=31536000+, includeSubDomains, preload).
Not in the Chrome preload list — first-time visitors over plain HTTP can be downgraded by a network attacker before HSTS kicks in.
Learn more ▾ ▴
The HSTS header only protects users who have already visited the site (TOFU window). Adding your domain to the Chrome preload list closes that gap so HSTS is enforced from the very first connection. Requires a preload-ready header (max-age=31536000+, includeSubDomains, preload) then submission at hstspreload.org. Inclusion ships in the next Chrome release after acceptance.
Source: hstspreload.org
A+TLS & CertificatesTLS 1.3, 8 checks passedPASS
Without stapling, the browser performs a separate OCSP roundtrip on first connection -- adding latency and leaking the visited host to the CA. Enable OCSP stapling on your TLS server.
Without OCSP stapling, every first-time visitor pays an extra OCSP roundtrip — and the CA learns who's visiting your site.
Learn more ▾ ▴
OCSP stapling has the server fetch its own revocation status from the CA and attach the signed response to the TLS handshake. Without it, browsers contact the CA directly: extra latency for the user and a privacy leak (the CA sees who connected). Enable ssl_stapling on (nginx) / SSLUseStapling On (Apache) / OCSPStapling = on (Caddy auto-enables).
Source: RFC 6961 / Mozilla Server-Side TLS guide
Certificate Chain
A+Cross-Origin Tab SafetyNo new-tab links found -- no tabnabbing surfacePASS
A+CSP Inline-Style ReadinessNo inline style attributes -- strict CSP is feasiblePASS
A+Bot Challenge DetectionScan reached real page content (no bot-protection interstitial)PASS
A+Soft-404 DetectionNo soft-404 patterns detected in page title or headingsPASS
A+Empty Page DetectionPage has substantive body text and no placeholder / template-leak signalsPASS
A+Geo-Restriction DetectionNo geo-restriction signals detected -- scan reached the page from an allowed regionPASS
A+Maintenance Mode DetectionNo maintenance-mode signals detected -- scan reached a normal pagePASS
A+Subresource Integrity AdoptionPage has no third-party scripts or stylesheets -- SRI not applicablePASS
A+CORS DepthNo CORS response headers -- the resource is same-origin-only by browser defaultPASS
A+Referrer-Policy StrictnessReferrer-Policy is `strict-origin-when-cross-origin` (modern default -- full URL same-origin, origin-only cross-origin)PASS
A+HTML Version DisclosureNo software-version disclosures in HTMLPASS
A+Open Redirect SurfaceNo redirect-shaped query parameters in DOM linksPASS
A+Auth SecurityPage is not a login form -- auth-security checks are N/APASS
A+Subdomain Inventory ExposureNo risky subdomain names in certificate SANsPASS
A+Subresource IntegrityNo external resourcesPASS
A+JS Library VulnerabilitiesNo known vulnerabilitiesPASS
No known JavaScript library vulnerabilities detected.
A+Information LeakageNo exposuresPASS
No sensitive files exposed — all paths returned 404.
| Path | Status | Category | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| /.git/HEAD | ✓ Not found | Version Control | — |
| /.git/config | ✓ Not found | Version Control | — |
| /.svn/entries | ✓ Not found | Version Control | — |
| /.env | ✓ Not found | Configuration | — |
| /.env.local | ✓ Not found | Configuration | — |
| /.env.production | ✓ Not found | Configuration | — |
| /wp-config.php | ✓ Not found | Configuration | — |
| /.htaccess | ✓ Not found | Configuration | — |
| /phpinfo.php | ✓ Not found | Debug | — |
| /server-status | ✓ Not found | Debug | — |
| /server-info | ✓ Not found | Debug | — |
| /.well-known/security.txt | ✗ Exposed | Security Policy | Info |
| /package.json | ✓ Not found | dependency-manifest | — |
| /composer.json | ✓ Not found | dependency-manifest | — |
| /Gemfile | ✓ Not found | dependency-manifest | — |
| /Gemfile.lock | ✓ Not found | dependency-manifest | — |
| /requirements.txt | ✓ Not found | dependency-manifest | — |
| /pom.xml | ✓ Not found | dependency-manifest | — |
| /.gitlab-ci.yml | ✓ Not found | ci-config | — |
| /.travis.yml | ✓ Not found | ci-config | — |