Skip to content
https://omegait.ru

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
63
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
3
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
3 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
4.80g CO2 per view
FIX
4.80g CO2 per view
Critical::
4.80g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 16.9 MB, producing an estimated 4.80g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.89g, network 0.83g, end-user device 3.08g.
Got: 4.80g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 575.9 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 575.9 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 71992 smartphones.

4.80g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 16.9 MB

Your site
4.80g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.89g
Network
0.83g
End-user device
3.08g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 48.0 kg · Annual: 575.9 kg · ≈ 71992 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
4.80g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

4.80g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 700% more
vs Target 860% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
96% cached
PASS
96% cached
Info::
96% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 658 KB (vs 17354 KB first visit). 280 of 295 resources are served from browser cache, saving 4.62g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.18g CO2 (first visit: 4.80g)
First visit
17354 KB
Repeat visit
658 KB

96% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 4.62g CO2 per returning visitor

280 resources served from cache · 15 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
94% efficient
PASS
94% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 94%
Only 1044 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
94% efficient

Total waste: 1044 KB (6% of page weight)

Unused JS 1044 KB

0.29g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 17354 KB
Theoretical minimum 16309 KB
Potential savings 1044 KB (0.29g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

A+
Web Font Weight Variants
1 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
1 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
1 font weight(s) loaded across 1 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
39 images, 6876 KB total, 6493 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

39

Total Size

6876 KB

Oversized

24

Wasted

6493 KB

39 missing alt text 39 missing dimensions 35 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback