Skip to content
https://techinasia.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
66
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.32g CO2 per view
FIX
1.32g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.32g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.7 MB, producing an estimated 1.32g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.25g, network 0.23g, end-user device 0.85g.
Got: 1.32g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 158.8 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 158.8 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 19851 smartphones.

1.32g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 30% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.7 MB

Your site
1.32g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.25g
Network
0.23g
End-user device
0.85g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 13.2 kg · Annual: 158.8 kg · ≈ 19851 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
70th percentile
FIX
70th percentile
Warning::
1.32g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 30% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 70th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.32g

70th percentile

Cleaner than 30% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 121% more
vs Target 165% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
78% efficient
REVIEW
78% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 78%
An estimated 1060 KB (22%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 1060 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.29g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
78% efficient

Total waste: 1060 KB (22% of page weight)

Unused JS 1060 KB

0.29g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4785 KB
Theoretical minimum 3725 KB
Potential savings 1060 KB (0.29g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 106 KB (vs 4785 KB first visit). 122 of 127 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.29g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.03g CO2 (first visit: 1.32g)
First visit
4785 KB
Repeat visit
106 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.29g CO2 per returning visitor

122 resources served from cache · 5 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback