Skip to content
https://tobaccoseed.co.uk Export & share
GB · GBP (£) · Estimated Applicable regulations: UK GDPR · PECR · Equality Act 2010 Dev cost: £75/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-07-20 17:45 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
36.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 473ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (78ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (955ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
154ms
DNS 42ms · TLS 61ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
78ms
DNS 19ms · TLS 41ms
United Stated - New York
335ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 152ms
United States - Santa Clara
625ms
DNS 29ms · TLS 314ms
Singapore - Singapore
693ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 349ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
955ms
DNS 227ms · TLS 372ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 473ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 5

22 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£656 investment → £13,056/month returns + GBP 50,000 risk avoided

Investment
£656
8.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
£13,056
£156,672/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+23774% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 50,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£4690.0 mo payback · +33323% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£19 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
6
2 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
68
C
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 8.0s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 5.5s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 22 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£656 8.8 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£19 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

£8,335 / month at risk ~£100,017 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£50,000

Equality Act 2010
  • No <main> landmark found
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£8,335 /mo

+27.8pp bounce · ~2,778 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 3.00

Bandwidth Waste

£0.22 /mo

3542.6 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~354 KB per page load
    Saves £0.22/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

69
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
70
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.67 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.03 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

155 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.05 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.17 s

Desktop

96
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
55
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

882 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.25 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.025

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

882 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.25 s

Categories

8
Avg score 81.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 931 peers
You 82
·
Avg 74
+8 above average
0 50 100
Security P91Compliance P10Accessibility P90Performance P82Infrastructure P22SEO P26Sustainability P73Content P60

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 71 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 93% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3916 peers
You 82
·
Avg 73
+9 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P92Security P90Compliance P15Performance P83Infrastructure P18Sustainability P74Content P61SEO P45

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 71 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 93% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap, on IIS, hosted on GoDaddy

15 technologies detected 4 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager PayPal Statcounter
Framework
Bootstrap Google Search Console Microsoft Microsoft 365 Open Graph Tailwind CSS Windows Server jQuery 1.7.1
Server
IIS 10.0
Hosting
GoDaddy Microsoft IIS 10.0

All Detected Technologies (15)

Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence NS record: ns04.domaincontrol.com

Internet Information Services (IIS) is an extensible web server software created by Microsoft for use with the Windows NT family.

Categories Web servers Website https://www.iis.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Server Website https://www.iis.net Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
Categories Library Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Stylesheet: https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.0.0/css/bootstrap.min.css
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=0T8H_VaBPj3egBuLJQUDuN3EuJQynvHDQ0T_7Eybyek
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms49654289
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: tobaccoseed-co-uk.mail.protection.outlook.com

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 6 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Windows Server is a brand name for a group of server operating systems.

Categories Operating systems Website https://microsoft.com/windowsserver Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://www.tobaccoseed.co.uk/js/jquery.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-8M9MSWJRE5

PayPal is an online payments system that supports online money transfers and serves as an electronic alternative to traditional paper methods like checks and money orders.

Categories Payment processors Website https://paypal.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Website https://www.statcounter.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (4)

Server version exposed in headers

The Server header reveals 'IIS 10.0'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

jQuery version may be outdated

Detected jQuery 1.7.1. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

15 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftobaccoseed.co.uk)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/tobaccoseed.co.uk)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/tobaccoseed.co.uk"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftobaccoseed.co.uk" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftobaccoseed.co.uk

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 9h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → B (84)
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+6

Medium effort, high structural impact

4 findings 8h → A (90)
  • · 22 control(s) without accessible label
  • · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback