Skip to content
https://seogarden.net

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
73
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
5
PASS
1
INFO
1
Checks
8
1 PASS 5 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.50g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.50g CO2 per view
Info::
0.50g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.8 MB, producing an estimated 0.50g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.09g, network 0.09g, end-user device 0.32g.
Got: 0.50g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 60.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 60.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 7562 smartphones.

0.50g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 60% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.8 MB

Your site
0.50g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.09g
Network
0.09g
End-user device
0.32g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 5.0 kg · Annual: 60.5 kg · ≈ 7562 smartphone charges
B
Carbon Budget
40th percentile
REVIEW
40th percentile
Info::
0.50g CO2 — below the median website (0.60g)
Better than an estimated 60% of websites, but above the sustainability target of 0.50g. Reducing page weight would help reach the target.
Info::
Estimated 40th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.50g

40th percentile

Cleaner than 60% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 16% cleaner ✓
vs Target 1% more
C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
68% efficient
REVIEW
68% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 68%
An estimated 588 KB (32%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 588 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.16g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
68% efficient

Total waste: 588 KB (32% of page weight)

Unused JS 588 KB

0.16g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1823 KB
Theoretical minimum 1234 KB
Potential savings 588 KB (0.16g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 50 KB (vs 1823 KB first visit). 47 of 49 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.49g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.50g)
First visit
1823 KB
Repeat visit
50 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.49g CO2 per returning visitor

47 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

Image Optimization
13 images, 370 KB total, 6 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

13

Total Size

370 KB

Oversized

1

Wasted

6 KB

7 missing dimensions 7 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback