Skip to content
https://igvita.com

SEO

· 7 checks — Canonical, meta, content depth, internal links, image SEO, and hreflang rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
86
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
3
INFO
1

Cross-tab audit — SEO, performance, crawlability, mobile, structured data

Checks
7
3 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Schema Markup Audit
Action
1 schema types detected
FIX

Rich result eligibility

Article Not eligible

Article rich results

Missing: image, datePublished

Detected schema types

Article json-ld → Article rich results
2/4 required · 2/2 recommended
Required fields (Google)
  • headline — Required — used as the rich result title
  • image — Add at least one high-resolution image (1200px+ wide) Required for top-stories carousel eligibility
  • author — Required by Google's E-E-A-T guidelines
  • datePublished — Add datePublished in ISO 8601 format Required for time-sensitive rich results
Recommended fields
  • dateModified — Signals freshness to the news algorithm
  • description — Used as the result snippet
Google's spec for this type

Your Article structured data is missing required fields for Google's Article rich results. Without these, the page won't qualify for rich results.

Why this matters

Schema entity missing required properties — Google's rich-result eligibility check fails; the schema is in source but never renders enhanced.

Source: Google Search Central

C
Content Depth
Action
377 words, Difficult
REVIEW
377 words, Difficult
Info::
Page has 377 words of content
Info::
Text-to-HTML ratio is 2%
Very low ratio suggests heavy framework overhead or boilerplate.
Info::
Reading level: Difficult (grade 11)
377 words

Good depth

Reading level

Very Easy
Easy
Fairly Easy
Standard
Fairly Difficult
Difficult
Very Difficult

Grade 11

Text-to-HTML Ratio

2% text 98% HTML

2 KB / 138 KB

Very low ratio suggests heavy framework overhead or boilerplate.

Why this matters

Informational: ratio of visible text bytes to total HTML bytes. Very low ratios suggest excessive markup overhead.

B
Image SEO
8 images, 2 descriptive filenames
REVIEW
8 images, 2 descriptive filenames
Warning::
75% of images have non-descriptive filenames
Search engines use filenames as a signal. Rename to descriptive names like 'team-photo.jpg'.
2 descriptive
0 hash-based
6 generic
8 total
FilenameQualityAltIssues
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1

See Accessibility tab for detailed alt text quality analysis.

Search engines use filenames as a signal. Rename to descriptive names like 'team-photo.jpg'.

Why this matters

Most image filenames are non-descriptive (hash/IMG_X) — small SEO miss for Image Search ranking.

Source: Google Image SEO

A+
Canonical URL
Properly configured
PASS
Properly configured
Info::
Canonical tag present
Got: https://ilya.grigorik.com/
Info::
Canonical is self-referencing
Info::
Canonical matches final URL after redirects
Info::
Canonical target returns 200
Info::
Canonical points to a different domain
Canonical URL Configured
Page URL https://igvita.com Canonical https://ilya.grigorik.com/ Match Self-referencing (correct) Target 200 ✓
A
Meta Tags
Title: 13 chars
PASS
Title: 13 chars
Info::
Page title is set
Got: Ilya Grigorik
Warning::
Title is only 13 characters — consider expanding
Title

"Ilya Grigorik"

13 characters Too short
Robots: Indexable (no restrictions)
Hreflang
0 hreflang tags
INFO
0 hreflang tags

No hreflang tags detected.

Hreflang tags are only needed for multilingual or multi-regional sites.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback