Skip to content
IT · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €55/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-07-10 11:21 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
1.7m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 505ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (34ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1012ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
580ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 288ms
Spain - Madrid
168ms
DNS 38ms · TLS 67ms
United Stated - New York
408ms
DNS 86ms · TLS 162ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
34ms
DNS 17ms · TLS 10ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1012ms
DNS 192ms · TLS 413ms
Singapore - Singapore
828ms
DNS 162ms · TLS 335ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 505ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Sustainability needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 27.0 MB (13.6 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

1 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

6 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 10.2s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 10.2s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€385 investment → €10,672/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€385
7.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€10.672
€128.064/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+33163% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€3580.0 mo payback · +35722% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€55 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
6
3 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
61
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 10.2s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 7.7s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.8s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 151 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€385 7.0 developer hours at €55/hr
Quick wins
€55 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.379 / month at risk ~€76.552 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • 5 of 5 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Multiple H1 headings (4 found)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.376 /mo

+29.0pp bounce · ~2,898 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€3,18 /mo

42910.1 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~4.3 MB per page load
    Saves €3,18/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

28
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
76
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.34 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

10.24 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.83 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.011

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

15.93 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

53.73 s

Desktop

54
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
80
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.55 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.48 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

260 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.016

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.63 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

13.58 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Adobe Experience Manager · 165 peers
You 77
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Better than 89% of Adobe Experience Manager sites See full Adobe Experience Manager benchmark →
CMS · 1787 peers
You 77
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Better than 74% of CMS sites

Technology stack

Adobe Experience Manager, on Java

17 technologies detected 4 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Adobe Experience Platform Launch Dynamic Yield Google Tag Manager
CMS
Adobe Experience Manager Stellantis
Framework
Facebook GSAP Google Maps Google Search Console HSTS Open Graph Swiper YouTube jQuery 3.6.0 lit-element 4.2.2 lit-html 3.3.2
Runtime
Java

All Detected Technologies (17)

Java is a class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.

Categories Programming languages Website https://java.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a content management solution for building websites, mobile apps and forms.

Categories CMS Website https://www.adobe.com/marketing/experience-manager.html Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Stellantis is a global automaker and provider of mobility solutions.

Categories CMS Website https://www.stellantis.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=yqc7w7lx931eym2u4qa2tz9zx0h6n5

GSAP is an animation library that allows you to create animations with JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://greensock.com/gsap Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Maps is a web mapping service. It offers satellite imagery, aerial photography, street maps, 360° interactive panoramic views of streets, real-time traffic conditions, and route planning for traveling by foot, car, bicycle and air, or public transportation.

Categories Maps Website https://maps.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=XV9GUEouoPprabBG8u2uFDjvSf5vc_jHJutq7eL7ZRk

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

YouTube is a video sharing service where users can create their own profile, upload videos, watch, like and comment on other videos.

Categories Video players Website https://www.youtube.com Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.0.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

lit-element is a simple base class for creating web components that work in any web page with any framework. lit-element uses lit-html to render into shadow DOM, and adds API to manage properties and attributes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://lit.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

lit-html is a simple, modern, safe, small and fast HTML templating library for JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://lit.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Adobe Experience Cloud Launch is an extendable tag management solution for Adobe Experience Cloud, Adobe Experience Platform, and other applications.

Categories Tag managers Website https://docs.adobelaunch.com/getting-started Detected by BeaverCheck

Dynamic Yield is a provider of automated conversion optimisation tools for marketers and retailers.

Categories A/B Testing, Personalisation Website https://www.dynamicyield.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-5S56HJM&l=dataLayerFCA

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Facebook) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

17 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffiat.it)](https://beavercheck.com/results/af13f1aa-d5af-4c74-96ef-bd68c4545e7f)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/af13f1aa-d5af-4c74-96ef-bd68c4545e7f"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffiat.it" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffiat.it

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (82)
  • · Page weighs 27.0 MB (13.6 MB transferred)
  • · 1 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · 6 image-in-link without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (87)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback