Skip to content
https://moneycontrol.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
56
GRADE
D
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
3
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
3 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Akamai: Committed to 50% renewable by 2030
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Akamai✗

Akamai: Committed to 50% renewable by 2030

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
67% efficient
REVIEW
67% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 67%
An estimated 302 KB (33%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 302 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.08g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
67% efficient

Total waste: 302 KB (33% of page weight)

Unused JS 302 KB

0.08g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 924 KB
Theoretical minimum 622 KB
Potential savings 302 KB (0.08g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.26g CO2 per view
PASS
0.26g CO2 per view
Info::
0.26g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 0.9 MB, producing an estimated 0.26g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.05g, network 0.04g, end-user device 0.16g.
Got: 0.26g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 30.7 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 30.7 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 3836 smartphones.

0.26g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 85% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 0.9 MB

Your site
0.26g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.05g
Network
0.04g
End-user device
0.16g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 2.6 kg · Annual: 30.7 kg · ≈ 3836 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 28 KB (vs 924 KB first visit). 54 of 58 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.25g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.26g)
First visit
924 KB
Repeat visit
28 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.25g CO2 per returning visitor

54 resources served from cache · 4 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
15th percentile
PASS
15th percentile
Info::
0.26g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 85% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 15th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.26g

15th percentile

Cleaner than 85% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 57% cleaner ✓
vs Target 49% cleaner ✓
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback