Skip to content
https://uhc.com Export & share
Scanned
2026-04-22 23:57 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
3.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Performance, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 19.6 MB (6.2 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Warning: 5

156 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 20.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 20.3s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$625 investment → $8,714/month returns

Investment
$625
6.3 h · 3 findings
Monthly returns
$8,714
$104,571/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+16631% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.1 mo payback · +16631% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$25 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.

Barriers
5
2 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+25pp
added vs baseline
Score
71
B
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
1
  • Page takes 20.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 17.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 8.7s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 1 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$625 6.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$25 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,714 / month at risk ~$104,571 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,713 /mo

+24.9pp bounce · ~2,489 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 3.50

Bandwidth Waste

$1.56 /mo

19457.7 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.9 MB per page load
    Saves $1.56/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

26
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.94 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

20.32 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

8.66 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.082

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

15.54 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

41.78 s

Desktop

32
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.61 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.89 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.86 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.02 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

9.01 s

Categories

8
Avg score 76.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Adobe Experience Manager · 159 peers
You 74
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Better than 66% of Adobe Experience Manager sites See full Adobe Experience Manager benchmark →
Adobe Client Data Layer · 85 peers
You 74
·
Avg 71
At average
0 50 100
Better than 77% of Adobe Client Data Layer sites See full Adobe Client Data Layer benchmark →

Technology stack

Adobe Experience Manager, on Java

24 technologies detected 4 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Adobe Analytics Adobe Experience Platform Launch Adobe Target 2.10.0 Branch Datadog LivePerson
CMS
Adobe Experience Manager
Framework
Adobe Client Data Layer 2.0.2 Bootstrap Google Search Console LazySizes Microsoft Open Graph Proofpoint Qualtrics Radix UI React React Router 6 ServiceNow Tailwind CSS Underscore.js 4.17.23 ZURB Foundation core-js 3.49.0
Runtime
Java

All Detected Technologies (24)

Java is a class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.

Categories Programming languages Website https://java.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a content management solution for building websites, mobile apps and forms.

Categories CMS Website https://www.adobe.com/marketing/experience-manager.html Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Adobe Client Data Layer is a framework of JavaScript objects on your site that contains all variable values used in your implementation.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://github.com/adobe/adobe-client-data-layer Detected by BeaverCheck

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://cdn.gbqofs.com/uhg/common/p/detector-bootstrap.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=Iui_keS7JieeO26aZ4ij4_9FBPx42sK2KAs6KFtjd78

LazySizes is a JavaScript library used to delay the loading of images (iframes, scripts, etc) until they come into view.

Categories JavaScript libraries, Performance Website https://github.com/aFarkas/lazysizes Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms27805985

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: mxa-0077b904.gslb.pphosted.com

Qualtrics is an cloud-based platform for creating and distributing web-based surveys.

Categories Surveys Website https://www.qualtrics.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Radix UI is a React-based user interface component library that offers accessible, responsive, and customisable components for building web applications.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://www.radix-ui.com Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

React Router provides declarative routing for React.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactrouter.com Detected by BeaverCheck

ServiceNow is a cloud computing platform to help companies manage digital workflows for enterprise operations.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.servicenow.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 13 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Underscore.js is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks. It is comparable to features provided by Prototype.js and the Ruby language, but opts for a functional programming design instead of extending object prototypes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://underscorejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Zurb Foundation is used to prototype in the browser. Allows rapid creation of websites or applications while leveraging mobile and responsive technology. The front end framework is the collection of HTML, CSS, and Javascript containing design patterns.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://foundation.zurb.com Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Adobe Analytics is a web analytics, marketing and cross-channel analytics application.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.adobe.com/analytics/adobe-analytics.html Detected by BeaverCheck

Adobe Experience Cloud Launch is an extendable tag management solution for Adobe Experience Cloud, Adobe Experience Platform, and other applications.

Categories Tag managers Website https://docs.adobelaunch.com/getting-started Detected by BeaverCheck

Adobe Target is an A/B testing, multi-variate testing, personalisation, and optimisation application

Categories A/B Testing, Personalisation Website https://www.adobe.com/marketing/target.html Detected by BeaverCheck

Branch is a mobile deep linking system to increase engagement and retention.

Categories Marketing automation, Analytics Website https://branch.io Detected by BeaverCheck

Datadog is a SaaS-based monitoring and analytics platform for large-scale applications and infrastructure.

Categories RUM, Analytics Website https://www.datadoghq.com Detected by BeaverCheck

LivePerson is a tool for conversational chatbots and messaging.

Categories Live chat Website https://www.liveperson.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Adobe Client Data Layer) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

24 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fuhc.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/b25b7fa5-ba3c-418a-a302-10618f4f59a9)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/b25b7fa5-ba3c-418a-a302-10618f4f59a9"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fuhc.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fuhc.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (83)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → B (80)
  • · Page weighs 19.6 MB (6.2 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 156 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (83)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback