Performance
· 17 checks — Lighthouse + waterfall + sustainability rolled into one auditable list.Performance-focused optimization plan with CWV assessment, top offenders, and time estimates
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.19 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.89 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
575 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.19 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
6.80 s
Page Load Progression
DThird-Party ImpactAction94% third-party, 0 ms blockingFIX
CJS Execution CostAction1457ms total JS executionREVIEW
Main Thread Breakdown
| Script | Total | Scripting | Parse/Compile | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-NEX8LJ5P86&cx=c>m=4e64k1 | 331ms | 270ms | 58ms | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-TK9BQL5X7Z&cx=c>m=4e64k1 | 300ms | 245ms | 53ms | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-LQCS | 297ms | 236ms | 55ms | 3rd |
| Unattributable | 170ms | 14ms | 0ms | 3rd |
| https://unric.org/ | 168ms | 35ms | 8ms | 1st |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NWD9V88 | 140ms | 99ms | 40ms | 3rd |
| https://analytics.unric.org/matomo.js | 51ms | 43ms | 8ms | 3rd |
CJS BundlesAction7 scripts, 276 KB unusedREVIEW
Downloaded but never executed on this page.
| Script | Size | Unused | Minified | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NWD9V88 | 117 KB | 65 KB (55%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-NEX8LJ5P86&cx=c>m=4e64k1 | 156 KB | 63 KB (40%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-TK9BQL5X7Z&cx=c>m=4e64k1 | 154 KB | 62 KB (40%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-LQCS | 139 KB | 62 KB (45%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://e4k4c4x9.delivery.rocketcdn.me/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.7.1 | 34 KB | 25 KB (76%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://analytics.unric.org/matomo.js | 22 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://static.cloudflareinsights.com/beacon.min.js/v8c78df7c7c0f484497ecbca7046644da1771523124516 | 11 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
BPage Weight Inventory17 resources · 763 KB · 276 KB savings availableREVIEW
~275.9 KiB of savings available
| # | Resource | Type | Size | Cache | Unused | 3rd party | Issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | ||||||
| 17 resources | 763.4 KiB | ||||||
BHTTP Cachingmax-age=0REVIEW
max-age=0
| Directive | Value | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| max-age | 0 | Cache for 0 seconds |
APage Weight Budget763 KB transferred, 17 requestsPASS
Large JavaScript bundles delay interactivity. Split code by route or defer non-critical scripts.
JavaScript bundle is large — code-split routes and lazy-load off-screen components to defer.
Source: web.dev
A+Text CompressionAll text resources are compressedPASS
A+Image Optimization2 images, 0 KB saveablePASS
A+Font LoadingNo web fonts (system fonts)PASS
A+Resource CachingAll resources properly cachedPASS
A+Critical Rendering PathNo render-blocking resourcesPASS
A+Resource HintsNo optimization neededPASS
A+Render-Blocking ResourcesNo render-blocking resources detectedPASS
A+Third-Party ResourcesNo third-party resources detectedPASS
A+Green HostingWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructurePASS
Green Hosting
This site is hosted on green energy infrastructure
Provider: Cloudflare
Network Waterfall17 requests over 895msINFO
Third-Party Script CostPer-script blocking time, transfer cost, and cache headersINFO
| Script | Category | Execution | Transfer | Unused | Monthly Cost | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 331ms | 156 KB | 40% | $4/mo | Costly |
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 300ms | 154 KB | 40% | $4/mo | Costly |
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 297ms | 139 KB | 45% | $4/mo | Costly |
Unattributable Unattributable | Other | 170ms | 0 KB | — | $2/mo | Optional |
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 140ms | 117 KB | 55% | $2/mo | Optional |
analytics.unric.org analytics.unric.org | Other | 51ms | 22 KB | — | $1/mo | Optional |
These scripts may cost more than they're worth
- Google Tag Manager adds 331ms and costs ~$4/month
- Google Tag Manager adds 300ms and costs ~$4/month
- Google Tag Manager adds 297ms and costs ~$4/month
88% of JavaScript execution time is spent on third-party scripts. Consider auditing which scripts are essential.
When third-party JS execution time exceeds your own, performance gains from frontend work are capped by code you don't own.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Every millisecond of third-party JS competes with your own for main-thread time. If their share is bigger than yours, optimization on your code base barely moves the needle. Audit, defer, or remove third-parties before further frontend optimization. Use Lighthouse's third-party audit to identify the worst offenders.
Source: web.dev
Google Tag Manager takes 331ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
Google Tag Manager takes 300ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
Google Tag Manager takes 297ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
55% of Google Tag Manager's code is unused. The script may be loading features you don't use.
Bundle has high unused-code ratio — tree-shaking and route-splitting recover the wasted bytes.
Source: web.dev