Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
1 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
1 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€659 investment → €8,158/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.
- Page takes 12.9s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 10.4s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 780msClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Layout shifts during page loadContent movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields→ Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€500.000
- Multiple <main> landmarks (2 found)EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
- Heading level skipped: H1 → H3 (missing H2)EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
- 1 control(s) without accessible labelEAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€6.324 /mo
+28.7pp bounce · ~2,875 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€0,68 /mo
9240.6 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~924 KB per page loadSaves €0,68/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
7.45 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
12.90 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
780 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.119
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
7.45 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
17.59 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.86 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.11 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
45 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.135
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.91 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
3.86 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
1 control(s) without accessible label
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Technology stack
Craft CMS, on GraphQL, hosted on Amazon Web Services, with Cloudflare CDN
Stack Architecture
SEOmatic 
Craft CMS 
Amazon ELB Amazon Route 53 
Apollo 3.13.8Facebook Google Search Console Google Tag Manager Google Workspace 
Nuxt.js 
Open Graph 
Pinia 
Priority Hints 
Tailwind CSS 
Vue.js 
Yii 
ZURB Foundation 
GraphQL 
PHP 
Cloudflare 
Amazon Web Services All Detected Technologies (21)
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.
GraphQL is a query language for APIs and a runtime for fulfilling those queries with your existing data.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
Craft CMS is a content management system for building bespoke websites.
AWS ELB is a network load balancer service provided by Amazon Web Services for distributing traffic across multiple targets, such as Amazon EC2 instances, containers, IP addresses, and Lambda functions.
Apollo is a fully-featured caching GraphQL client with integrations for React, Angular, and more.
Nuxt is a Vue framework for developing modern web applications.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Pinia is a state management library for Vue.js.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.
Yii is an open-source, object-oriented, component-based MVC PHP web application framework.
Zurb Foundation is used to prototype in the browser. Allows rapid creation of websites or applications while leveraging mobile and responsive technology. The front end framework is the collection of HTML, CSS, and Javascript containing design patterns.
SEOmatic facilitates modern SEO best practices & implementation for Craft CMS 3.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Amazon ELB) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
21 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/b815444c-bf76-493e-a4c6-3ce64de04fb3)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/b815444c-bf76-493e-a4c6-3ce64de04fb3"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpoetryfoundation.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpoetryfoundation.orgExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (81)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+4Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 1 link(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+5Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 control(s) without accessible label
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found