Skip to content
https://pullitpacks.com

Sustainability

· 7 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
79
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
0
Checks
7
3 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
AWS: Renewable energy varies by region; committed to 100% by 2025
Info::
AWS CloudFront: Renewable varies by edge location
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting AWSCDN AWS CloudFront

AWS: Renewable energy varies by region; committed to 100% by 2025

AWS CloudFront: Renewable varies by edge location

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Transfer Efficiency
88% efficient
REVIEW
88% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 88%
An estimated 124 KB (12%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 124 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.03g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
88% efficient

Total waste: 124 KB (12% of page weight)

Unused JS 124 KB

0.03g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1001 KB
Theoretical minimum 876 KB
Potential savings 124 KB (0.03g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

B
Web Font Weight Variants
7 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)
REVIEW
7 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)
Info::
7 font weights loaded -- review whether all are used
5+ weights for a single page is often more than needed. Compare against the actual font-weight CSS rules in your stylesheets; trim weights that aren't applied to any element. Affected families: Inter, Space Grotesk.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.28g CO2 per view
PASS
0.28g CO2 per view
Info::
0.28g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.0 MB, producing an estimated 0.28g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.05g, network 0.05g, end-user device 0.18g.
Got: 0.28g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 33.2 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 33.2 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 4153 smartphones.

0.28g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 83% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.0 MB

Your site
0.28g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.05g
Network
0.05g
End-user device
0.18g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 2.8 kg · Annual: 33.2 kg · ≈ 4153 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
PASS
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 1 KB (vs 1001 KB first visit). 45 of 46 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.28g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.28g)
First visit
1001 KB
Repeat visit
1 KB

100% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.28g CO2 per returning visitor

45 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
17th percentile
PASS
17th percentile
Info::
0.28g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 83% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 17th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.28g

17th percentile

Cleaner than 83% of websites

Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 54% cleaner ✓
vs Target 45% cleaner ✓
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback