Skip to content
CH · CHF (CHF) · Estimated Applicable regulations: nDSG/FADP Dev cost: CHF 130/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-09-25 19:36 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
58.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 938ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (161ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1740ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control header is missing. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
184ms
DNS 74ms · TLS 38ms
United Stated - New York
810ms
DNS 487ms · TLS 103ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
161ms
DNS 94ms · TLS 23ms
United States - Santa Clara
1342ms
DNS 835ms · TLS 165ms
Singapore - Singapore
1390ms
DNS 895ms · TLS 163ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1740ms
DNS 1101ms · TLS 211ms
CDN: No CDN (document or assets) · Avg TTFB: 938ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

oracles.ch fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

7 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Source maps reveal original source code (variable names, comments, file structure) and are shipped to production by mistake almost universally. The standard fix is a one-line build-tool config change.

Security › Source Map Exposure
Critical: 2

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 4

1 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

2 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

CHF 683 investment → CHF 9,423/month returns + CHF 250,000 risk avoided

Investment
CHF 683
5.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
CHF 9’423
CHF 113’075/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+16468% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CHF 250’000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
CHF 488 → 0.1 mo payback · +23095% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
CHF 163 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
9
1 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
66
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 17.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 15.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 414ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 2 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

CHF683 5.3 developer hours at CHF130/hr
Quick wins
CHF163 3 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

CHF /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

CHF 9’423 / month at risk ~CHF 113’075 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

CHF 250’000

nDSG/FADP
  • 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    nDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    nDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    nDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000

Bounce-Rate Cost

CHF 9’422 /mo

+29.4pp bounce · ~2,944 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CHF 3.20

Bandwidth Waste

CHF 0.68 /mo

9645.2 MB/mo × 0.071 CHF/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~965 KB per page load
    Saves CHF 0.68/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

46
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

8.72 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

17.56 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

414 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

8.72 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

17.85 s

Desktop

63
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.21 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.37 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

13 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.537

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.21 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.37 s

Categories

8
Avg score 77.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

AMP · 60 peers
You 78
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Better than 56% of AMP sites See full AMP benchmark →
Font Awesome · 705 peers
You 78
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Content P9Compliance P11Accessibility P78SEO P74Security P70Performance P55Infrastructure P47Sustainability P50

Top 10% of Font Awesome sites score 94+ on Content; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 69% of Font Awesome sites See full Font Awesome benchmark →

Technology stack

AMP, with Nginx CDN

12 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google AdSense Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
AMP Font Awesome Funding Choices Google Font API Priority Hints RSS jQuery 3.4.1 reCAPTCHA
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (12)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

AMP, originally created by Google, is an open-source HTML framework developed by the AMP open-source Project. AMP is designed to help webpages load faster.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://www.amp.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Funding Choices is a messaging tool that can help you comply with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and recover lost revenue from ad blocking users.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://developers.google.com/funding-choices Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

reCAPTCHA is a free service from Google that helps protect websites from spam and abuse.

Categories Security Website https://www.google.com/recaptcha/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google AdSense is a program run by Google through which website publishers serve advertisements that are targeted to the site content and audience.

Categories Advertising Website https://www.google.com/adsense/start/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-VTWH5FDH1S

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (AMP) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

12 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oracles.ch)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/oracles.ch)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/oracles.ch"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oracles.ch" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oracles.ch

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (84)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 7 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)
  • · 1 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → B (87)
  • · 2 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback