Skip to content
https://www.oracles.ch

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
75
GRADE
C
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
3
INFO
1
Checks
8
3 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
0.87g CO2 per view
FIX
0.87g CO2 per view
Info::
0.87g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 3.1 MB, producing an estimated 0.87g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.16g, network 0.15g, end-user device 0.56g.
Got: 0.87g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 104.2 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 104.2 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 13024 smartphones.

0.87g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 43% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.1 MB

Your site
0.87g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.16g
Network
0.15g
End-user device
0.56g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 8.7 kg · Annual: 104.2 kg · ≈ 13024 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
57th percentile
FIX
57th percentile
Warning::
0.87g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 43% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 57th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.87g

57th percentile

Cleaner than 43% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 45% more
vs Target 74% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 99 KB (vs 3139 KB first visit). 87 of 96 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.84g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.03g CO2 (first visit: 0.87g)
First visit
3139 KB
Repeat visit
99 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.84g CO2 per returning visitor

87 resources served from cache · 9 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
91% efficient
PASS
91% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 91%
Only 295 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
91% efficient

Total waste: 295 KB (9% of page weight)

Unused JS 295 KB

0.08g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 3139 KB
Theoretical minimum 2844 KB
Potential savings 295 KB (0.08g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

A+
Web Font Weight Variants
2 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
2 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
2 font weight(s) loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
23 images, 1953 KB total, 1398 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

23

Total Size

1953 KB

Oversized

11

Wasted

1398 KB

21 missing dimensions 20 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback