Skip to content
https://enjoycbd.es

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
73
GRADE
C
FIX
2
REVIEW
3
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 3 REVIEW 2 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
54th percentile
FIX
54th percentile
Warning::
0.76g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 46% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 54th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.76g

54th percentile

Cleaner than 46% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 27% more
vs Target 52% more
B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.76g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.76g CO2 per view
Info::
0.76g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.7 MB, producing an estimated 0.76g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.14g, network 0.13g, end-user device 0.49g.
Got: 0.76g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 91.4 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 91.4 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 11423 smartphones.

0.76g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 46% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.7 MB

Your site
0.76g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.14g
Network
0.13g
End-user device
0.49g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 7.6 kg · Annual: 91.4 kg · ≈ 11423 smartphone charges
C
Web Font Weight Variants
Action
19 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)
REVIEW
19 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)
Warning::
19 font weights loaded -- likely 100+ KB of unused payload
Loading 19 font weights typically transfers 200-400 KB just for fonts. Most pages legitimately use 2-3 weights (regular + bold, maybe medium). Audit which weights your stylesheet actually applies and trim the Google Fonts URL accordingly. Affected families: DM Sans, Jost%3A500.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 59 KB (vs 2753 KB first visit). 205 of 207 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.75g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 0.76g)
First visit
2753 KB
Repeat visit
59 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.75g CO2 per returning visitor

205 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
91% efficient
PASS
91% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 91%
Only 241 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
91% efficient

Total waste: 241 KB (9% of page weight)

Unused JS 241 KB

0.07g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 2753 KB
Theoretical minimum 2512 KB
Potential savings 241 KB (0.07g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
53 images, 5507 KB total, 4501 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

53

Total Size

5507 KB

Oversized

24

Wasted

4501 KB

28 missing dimensions 43 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback