Skip to content
https://Logosdown.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
78
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
1
Checks
8
3 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Transfer Efficiency
77% efficient
REVIEW
77% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 77%
An estimated 195 KB (23%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 195 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.05g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
77% efficient

Total waste: 195 KB (23% of page weight)

Unused JS 195 KB

0.05g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 864 KB
Theoretical minimum 668 KB
Potential savings 195 KB (0.05g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Web Font Weight Variants
Action
31 font weights loaded across 8 famil(y/ies)
REVIEW
31 font weights loaded across 8 famil(y/ies)
Warning::
31 font weights loaded -- likely 100+ KB of unused payload
Loading 31 font weights typically transfers 200-400 KB just for fonts. Most pages legitimately use 2-3 weights (regular + bold, maybe medium). Audit which weights your stylesheet actually applies and trim the Google Fonts URL accordingly. Affected families: Archivo, Google%20Sans%20Text%3A400%2C500, Google%20Sans%20Text%3A400%2C500%2C700, Google%20Sans%3A400, Google%20Sans%3A700, Google%20Symbols%3Aopsz%2Cwght%2CFILL%2CGRAD%4020..48%2C100..700%2C0..1%2C-50..200, Poppins, Roboto%3A500.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.24g CO2 per view
PASS
0.24g CO2 per view
Info::
0.24g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 0.8 MB, producing an estimated 0.24g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.04g, network 0.04g, end-user device 0.15g.
Got: 0.24g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 28.7 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 28.7 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 3584 smartphones.

0.24g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 87% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 0.8 MB

Your site
0.24g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.04g
Network
0.04g
End-user device
0.15g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 2.4 kg · Annual: 28.7 kg · ≈ 3584 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 15 KB (vs 864 KB first visit). 59 of 60 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.23g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.24g)
First visit
864 KB
Repeat visit
15 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.23g CO2 per returning visitor

59 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
13th percentile
PASS
13th percentile
Info::
0.24g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 87% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 13th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.24g

13th percentile

Cleaner than 87% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 60% cleaner ✓
vs Target 52% cleaner ✓
Image Optimization
3 images, 127 KB total, 94 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

3

Total Size

127 KB

Oversized

1

Wasted

94 KB

1 missing dimensions
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback