Skip to content
BE · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: AVG · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €80/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-21 22:20 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
5.0m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 4

59 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 6.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 6.9s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€580 investment → €11,477/month returns + EUR 120,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
€580
7.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€11.477
€137.720/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+23645% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.000.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5000.0 mo payback · +27444% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€20 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~34%.

Barriers
5
3 crit 2 warn
Bounce delta
+34pp
added vs baseline
Score
64
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
0
  • Page takes 6.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 4.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 910ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€580 7.3 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€20 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€7.459 / month at risk ~€89.507 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.000.000

ePrivacy DirectiveAVG
  • No privacy policy link detected
    AVG: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    AVG: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    AVG: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€7.458 /mo

+33.9pp bounce · ~3,390 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,47 /mo

6408.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~641 KB per page load
    Saves €0,47/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Categories

6
Avg score 66.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Apple · 1267 peers
You 64
·
Avg 73
-9 below average
0 50 100
Accessibility P1Infrastructure P1Security P70Sustainability P62Compliance P43Performance P44

Top 10% of Apple sites score 71+ on Accessibility; you're at 27 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Google Search Console · 3817 peers
You 64
·
Avg 73
-9 below average
0 50 100
Accessibility P1Infrastructure P1Security P69Performance P36Compliance P47Sustainability P53

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 71+ on Accessibility; you're at 27 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Technology stack

Apple, on Caddy/Go

4 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Apple Google Search Console
Runtime
Go
Server
Caddy

All Detected Technologies (4)

Caddy is a Go-based web server known for its simplicity and automatic HTTPS features.

Categories Web servers Website https://caddyserver.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Caddy
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Go is an open source high-level programming language.

Categories Programming languages Website https://go.dev Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=vplHa7Trg4h7Su5j
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=CAbH28xIl30qPcVDpm_7kborgiYb1k2LKXwV8gJ3nuA

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkuleuven.be)](https://beavercheck.com/results/c6877869-37b1-45d2-a264-218a81aed3ba)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/c6877869-37b1-45d2-a264-218a81aed3ba"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkuleuven.be" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkuleuven.be

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (73)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → D (68)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 59 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → C (73)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback