https://serebrokubachi.ru
Sustainability
· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
81
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
1
Checks
83 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
DGreen HostingActionUnknownFIX
Green Hosting
ActionUnknown
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
BTransfer Efficiency84% efficientREVIEW
Transfer Efficiency
84% efficient
84% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 84%
An estimated 173 KB (16%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 173 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.05g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
Total waste: 173 KB (16% of page weight)
Unused JS 173 KB
0.05g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 1087 KB
Theoretical minimum 914 KB
Potential savings 173 KB (0.05g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
BWeb Font Weight VariantsNo detectable Google Fonts weightsREVIEW
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
ACO2 Per Page Load0.30g CO2 per viewPASS
CO2 Per Page Load
0.30g CO2 per view
0.30g CO2 per view
Info::
0.30g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.1 MB, producing an estimated 0.30g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.06g, network 0.05g, end-user device 0.19g.
Got: 0.30g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 36.1 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 36.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 4513 smartphones.
0.30g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 80% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.1 MB
Your site
0.30g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.06g
Network
0.05g
End-user device
0.19g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 3.0 kg · Annual: 36.1 kg · ≈ 4513 smartphone charges
A+Repeat Visit Weight96% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
96% cached
96% cached
Info::
96% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 44 KB (vs 1087 KB first visit). 98 of 99 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.29g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.30g)
First visit
1087 KB
Repeat visit
44 KB
96% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.29g CO2 per returning visitor
98 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
ACarbon Budget20th percentilePASS
Carbon Budget
20th percentile
20th percentile
Info::
0.30g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 80% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 20th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.30g
20th percentile
Cleaner than 80% of websites
✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target
vs Median 50% cleaner ✓
vs Target 40% cleaner ✓
Image Optimization48 images, 184 KB total, 13 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization
48 images, 184 KB total, 13 KB wasted
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
48
Total Size
184 KB
Oversized
4
Wasted
13 KB
1 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.