Skip to content
https://nnnig.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
80
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
4
PASS
2
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
2 PASS 4 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.57g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.57g CO2 per view
Info::
0.57g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.0 MB, producing an estimated 0.57g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.11g, network 0.10g, end-user device 0.37g.
Got: 0.57g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 68.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 68.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 8558 smartphones.

0.57g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 53% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.0 MB

Your site
0.57g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.11g
Network
0.10g
End-user device
0.37g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 5.7 kg · Annual: 68.5 kg · ≈ 8558 smartphone charges
B
Carbon Budget
47th percentile
REVIEW
47th percentile
Info::
0.57g CO2 — below the median website (0.60g)
Better than an estimated 53% of websites, but above the sustainability target of 0.50g. Reducing page weight would help reach the target.
Info::
Estimated 47th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.57g

47th percentile

Cleaner than 53% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 5% cleaner ✓
vs Target 14% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
94% cached
PASS
94% cached
Info::
94% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 126 KB (vs 2063 KB first visit). 71 of 72 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.54g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.03g CO2 (first visit: 0.57g)
First visit
2063 KB
Repeat visit
126 KB

94% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.54g CO2 per returning visitor

71 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
100% efficient
PASS
100% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 100%
Only 0 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
100% efficient
Actual transfer 2063 KB
Theoretical minimum 2063 KB

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
22 images, 247 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

22

Total Size

247 KB

2 missing alt text 7 missing dimensions 10 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback