Audit overview
4 categories need attention: Performance, and 3 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 17.5 MB (6.2 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
1 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
AUD 798 investment → AUD 4,030/month returns + AUD 50,200,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.
- Page takes 21.6s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 19.1s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 4.9sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- 10 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
AUD 50,200,000
- No privacy policy link detectedPrivacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
- 7 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedPrivacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundPrivacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
AUD 4,028 /mo
+31.0pp bounce · ~3,098 lost visitors/mo
CPC: AUD 1.30
Bandwidth Waste
AUD 2.40 /mo
19491.3 MB/mo × 0.123 AUD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.9 MB per page loadSaves AUD 2.40/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.55 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
21.58 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
4.89 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
14.09 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
47.03 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
965 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.76 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
571 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
4.51 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
10.30 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 17.5 MB (6.2 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
1 control(s) without accessible label
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 83+ on Performance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 85+ on Performance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Amazon Route 53, on styled-components, hosted on Snowplow Analytics, with Fas...
Stack Architecture
AppNexus 
Chartbeat 
Cxense 
DoubleClick Floodlight 
Facebook Pixel 2.9.303
Google Analytics 
Google Publisher Tag 
Google Tag Manager 
Linkedin Insight Tag 
Microsoft Advertising 
Prebid 10.23.0
PubMatic 
Salesforce Interaction Studio 
TripleLift 
Cart Functionality 
Piano 
Funding Choices 
Google Font API Google Search Console Google Workspace 
Open Graph 
RSS 
React 
Survicate 
Varnish 
Webpack 
core-js 3.33.2
crypto-js 
styled-components 6.1.1
Fastly cdnjs 
Snowplow Analytics All Detected Technologies (35)
Snowplow is an open-source behavioral data management platform for businesses.
Styled components is a CSS-in-JS styling framework that uses tagged template literals in JavaScript.
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
Funding Choices is a messaging tool that can help you comply with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and recover lost revenue from ad blocking users.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.
React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.
Survicate is an all-in-one customer feedback tool that allows you collect feedback.
Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.
Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
crypto-js is a JavaScript library of crypto standards.
AppNexus is a cloud-based software platform that enables and optimizes programmatic online advertising.
Chartbeat is a web analytics service that provides real-time data and insights into website performance, audience engagement, and content effectiveness for publishers and media organizations.
Cxense was an AI-powered data management and intelligent personalisation platform.
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Publisher Tag (GPT) is an ad tagging library for Google Ad Manager which is used to dynamically build ad requests.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.
Microsoft Advertising is an online advertising platform developed by Microsoft.
Prebid is an open-source header bidding wrapper. It forms the core of our Nucleus ad platform, helping maximize revenue and performance for publishers.
PubMatic is a company that develops and implements online advertising software and strategies for the digital publishing and advertising industry.
Salesforce Interaction Studio (formerly Evergage) is a cloud-based software that allows users to collect, analyze, and respond to user behavior on their websites and web applications in real-time.
TripleLift is an advertising technology company providing native programmatic to buyers and sellers.
Piano is a enterprise SaaS company which specialising in advanced media business processes and ecommerce optimisation.
Observations (2)
Runtime exposed via X-Powered-By header
The X-Powered-By header reveals 'styled-components 6.1.1'. Remove this header in production to reduce information leakage.
Complex technology stack detected
35 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/cf8444af-43e6-43e4-9faa-72b3dd92de37)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/cf8444af-43e6-43e4-9faa-72b3dd92de37"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsmh.com.au" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsmh.com.auExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (81)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 17.5 MB (6.2 MB transferred)
- · HSTS header is missing
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+5Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 control(s) without accessible label
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found