Skip to content
https://fullerton.edu

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
64
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.34g CO2 per view
FIX
1.34g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.34g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.7 MB, producing an estimated 1.34g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.25g, network 0.23g, end-user device 0.86g.
Got: 1.34g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 160.2 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 160.2 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 20027 smartphones.

1.34g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 29% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.7 MB

Your site
1.34g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.25g
Network
0.23g
End-user device
0.86g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 13.4 kg · Annual: 160.2 kg · ≈ 20027 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Microsoft IIS✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
71th percentile
FIX
71th percentile
Warning::
1.34g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 29% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 71th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.34g

71st percentile

Cleaner than 29% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 123% more
vs Target 167% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 91 KB (vs 4827 KB first visit). 105 of 107 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.31g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.03g CO2 (first visit: 1.34g)
First visit
4827 KB
Repeat visit
91 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.31g CO2 per returning visitor

105 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
97% efficient
PASS
97% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 97%
Only 154 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
97% efficient

Total waste: 154 KB (3% of page weight)

Unused JS 154 KB

0.04g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4827 KB
Theoretical minimum 4672 KB
Potential savings 154 KB (0.04g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback