Skip to content
https://esteticdoctorpoa.com/index3.php

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
81
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
4
INFO
1
Checks
8
4 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

C
Web Font Weight Variants
Action
10 font weights loaded across 3 famil(y/ies)
REVIEW
10 font weights loaded across 3 famil(y/ies)
Warning::
10 font weights loaded -- likely 100+ KB of unused payload
Loading 10 font weights typically transfers 200-400 KB just for fonts. Most pages legitimately use 2-3 weights (regular + bold, maybe medium). Audit which weights your stylesheet actually applies and trim the Google Fonts URL accordingly. Affected families: Cormorant Garamond, Jost, Playfair Display.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.31g CO2 per view
PASS
0.31g CO2 per view
Info::
0.31g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.1 MB, producing an estimated 0.31g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.06g, network 0.05g, end-user device 0.20g.
Got: 0.31g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 37.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 37.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 4689 smartphones.

0.31g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 79% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.1 MB

Your site
0.31g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.06g
Network
0.05g
End-user device
0.20g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 3.1 kg · Annual: 37.5 kg · ≈ 4689 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 27 KB (vs 1130 KB first visit). 20 of 21 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.30g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.31g)
First visit
1130 KB
Repeat visit
27 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.30g CO2 per returning visitor

20 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
21th percentile
PASS
21th percentile
Info::
0.31g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 79% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 21th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.31g

21st percentile

Cleaner than 79% of websites

Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 48% cleaner ✓
vs Target 37% cleaner ✓
A+
Transfer Efficiency
94% efficient
PASS
94% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 94%
Only 71 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
94% efficient

Total waste: 71 KB (6% of page weight)

Unused JS 71 KB

0.02g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1130 KB
Theoretical minimum 1058 KB
Potential savings 71 KB (0.02g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
11 images, 723 KB total, 538 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

11

Total Size

723 KB

Oversized

7

Wasted

538 KB

11 missing dimensions 9 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback