Skip to content
https://www.motolink.sa/ar

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
68
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
3
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
3 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.85g CO2 per view
FIX
1.85g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.85g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 6.5 MB, producing an estimated 1.85g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.34g, network 0.32g, end-user device 1.19g.
Got: 1.85g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 222.1 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 222.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 27767 smartphones.

1.85g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 15% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 6.5 MB

Your site
1.85g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.34g
Network
0.32g
End-user device
1.19g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 18.5 kg · Annual: 222.1 kg · ≈ 27767 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
85th percentile
FIX
85th percentile
Warning::
1.85g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 15% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 85th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.85g

85th percentile

Cleaner than 15% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 209% more
vs Target 270% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
PASS
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 13 KB (vs 6693 KB first visit). 45 of 46 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.85g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 1.85g)
First visit
6693 KB
Repeat visit
13 KB

100% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.85g CO2 per returning visitor

45 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
100% efficient
PASS
100% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 100%
Only 23 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
100% efficient

Total waste: 23 KB (0% of page weight)

Unused JS 23 KB

0.01g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 6693 KB
Theoretical minimum 6669 KB
Potential savings 23 KB (0.01g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

A+
Web Font Weight Variants
3 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
3 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
3 font weight(s) loaded across 1 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
11 images, 447 KB total, 314 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

11

Total Size

447 KB

Oversized

4

Wasted

314 KB

10 missing dimensions 8 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback