https://diplo.de
Sustainability
· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
78
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
2
INFO
0
Checks
62 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
DGreen HostingActionUnknownFIX
Green Hosting
ActionUnknown
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
BCO2 Per Page Load0.56g CO2 per viewREVIEW
CO2 Per Page Load
0.56g CO2 per view
0.56g CO2 per view
Info::
0.56g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.0 MB, producing an estimated 0.56g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.10g, network 0.10g, end-user device 0.36g.
Got: 0.56g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 67.0 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 67.0 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 8374 smartphones.
0.56g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 55% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.0 MB
Your site
0.56g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.10g
Network
0.10g
End-user device
0.36g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 5.6 kg · Annual: 67.0 kg · ≈ 8374 smartphone charges
BCarbon Budget45th percentileREVIEW
Carbon Budget
45th percentile
45th percentile
Info::
0.56g CO2 — below the median website (0.60g)
Better than an estimated 55% of websites, but above the sustainability target of 0.50g. Reducing page weight would help reach the target.
Info::
Estimated 45th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.56g
45th percentile
Cleaner than 55% of websites
✗ Above the median website
vs Median 7% cleaner ✓
vs Target 12% more
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
A+Repeat Visit Weight98% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 30 KB (vs 2018 KB first visit). 65 of 67 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.55g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.56g)
First visit
2018 KB
Repeat visit
30 KB
98% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.55g CO2 per returning visitor
65 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded
A+Transfer Efficiency94% efficientPASS
Transfer Efficiency
94% efficient
94% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 94%
Only 121 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
Total waste: 121 KB (6% of page weight)
Unused JS 121 KB
0.03g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 2018 KB
Theoretical minimum 1897 KB
Potential savings 121 KB (0.03g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.