Skip to content
https://mail.ru

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
66
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
2.90g CO2 per view
FIX
2.90g CO2 per view
Critical::
2.90g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 10.2 MB, producing an estimated 2.90g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.54g, network 0.50g, end-user device 1.86g.
Got: 2.90g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 347.6 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 347.6 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 43448 smartphones.

2.90g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 10.2 MB

Your site
2.90g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.54g
Network
0.50g
End-user device
1.86g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 29.0 kg · Annual: 347.6 kg · ≈ 43448 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
2.90g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

2.90g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 383% more
vs Target 479% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
87% efficient
REVIEW
87% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 87%
An estimated 1385 KB (13%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 1385 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.38g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
87% efficient

Total waste: 1385 KB (13% of page weight)

Unused JS 1385 KB

0.38g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 10473 KB
Theoretical minimum 9088 KB
Potential savings 1385 KB (0.38g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 243 KB (vs 10473 KB first visit). 382 of 391 resources are served from browser cache, saving 2.83g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.07g CO2 (first visit: 2.90g)
First visit
10473 KB
Repeat visit
243 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 2.83g CO2 per returning visitor

382 resources served from cache · 9 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback