Skip to content
https://bridgeslab.sph.umich.edu Export & share
Scanned
2026-05-10 12:08 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 3236ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (1914ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (4086ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 6 locations above the 500ms target.

Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
4086ms
DNS 634ms · TLS 150ms
United Stated - New York
1914ms
DNS 23ms · TLS 25ms
Spain - Madrid
3280ms
DNS 664ms · TLS 121ms
United States - Santa Clara
2960ms
DNS 343ms · TLS 60ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
3115ms
DNS 525ms · TLS 161ms
Singapore - Singapore
4060ms
DNS 432ms · TLS 223ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 3236ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 5

11 third-party resources (61% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 5.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 5.7s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$642 investment → $9,510/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$642
6.4 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$9,510
$114,124/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+17685% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.1 mo payback · +18160% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$42 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~22%.

Barriers
5
1 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+22pp
added vs baseline
Score
78
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
1
  • Page takes 5.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$642 6.4 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$42 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$18,316 / month at risk ~$219,795 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H4 (missing H3)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$5,191 /mo

+21.6pp bounce · ~2,163 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.40

Bandwidth Waste

$0.20 /mo

2442.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~244 KB per page load
    Saves $0.20/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

63
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
88
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.22 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.73 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

148 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.54 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.95 s

Desktop

82
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
83
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.32 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.90 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.61 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.90 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 855 peers
You 82
·
Avg 73
+9 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Accessibility P97Security P96Performance P86Infrastructure P18SEO P75Sustainability P67Content P35

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Bootstrap Icons · 30 peers
You 82
·
Avg 73
+9 above average
0 50 100
Better than 93% of Bootstrap Icons sites See full Bootstrap Icons benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap 5.3.7, on Python, hosted on gunicorn, with jsDelivr CDN

13 technologies detected 5 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Facebook Login Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
Bootstrap 5.3.7 Bootstrap Icons 1.11.0Facebook SDK Font Awesome Tailwind CSS
Runtime
Python Python (Gunicorn)
CDN
jsDelivr jsDelivr CDN
Hosting
gunicorn

All Detected Technologies (13)

JSDelivr is a free public CDN for open-source projects. It can serve web files directly from the npm registry and GitHub repositories without any configuration.

Categories CDN Website https://www.jsdelivr.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Script URL contains cdn.jsdelivr.net: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bootstrap@5.3.7/dist/js/bootstrap.bundle.min.js
Categories Web servers Website https://gunicorn.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Python is an interpreted and general-purpose programming language.

Categories Programming languages Website https://python.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Runtime Website https://gunicorn.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence server: gunicorn

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bootstrap@5.3.7/dist/js/bootstrap.bundle.min.js, Stylesheet: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bootstrap@5.3.7/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap Icons is a growing library of SVG icons that are designed by @mdo and maintained by the Bootstrap Team.

Categories Font scripts Website https://icons.getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains connect.facebook.net: https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/bundle/sdk.js/

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 14 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Facebook Login is a way for people to create accounts and log into your app across multiple platforms.

Categories Authentication Website https://developers.facebook.com/docs/facebook-login/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HLFFK9ZMJE

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbridgeslab.sph.umich.edu)](https://beavercheck.com/results/ecb18faf-a9af-43b6-9e8f-e21b494ef9e2)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/ecb18faf-a9af-43b6-9e8f-e21b494ef9e2"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbridgeslab.sph.umich.edu" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbridgeslab.sph.umich.edu

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → B (87)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 11 third-party resources (61% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (89)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback