Skip to content
https://www.shreeinfotechsystems.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
90
GRADE
A
FIX
0
REVIEW
3
PASS
4
INFO
1
Checks
8
4 PASS 3 REVIEW
B
Transfer Efficiency
84% efficient
REVIEW
84% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 84%
An estimated 198 KB (16%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 198 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.05g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
84% efficient

Total waste: 198 KB (16% of page weight)

Unused JS 198 KB

0.05g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1231 KB
Theoretical minimum 1032 KB
Potential savings 198 KB (0.05g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.28g CO2 per view
PASS
0.28g CO2 per view
Info::
0.28g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.2 MB, producing an estimated 0.28g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.01g, network 0.06g, end-user device 0.22g.
Got: 0.28g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 34.2 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 34.2 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 4269 smartphones.
Info::
Green hosting reduces data center emissions

0.28g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 82% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.2 MB

Your site
0.28g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.01g
Network
0.06g
End-user device
0.22g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 2.8 kg · Annual: 34.2 kg · ≈ 4269 smartphone charges
A+
Green Hosting
Green (both)
PASS
Green (both)
Info::
Both hosting and CDN use renewable energy
Got: Hosting: Vercel, CDN: Vercel
Info::
Vercel: Hosted on AWS/Google Cloud with renewable energy commitments
Info::
Vercel: Hosted on AWS/Google Cloud with renewable energy commitments
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green Hosting✓ Green Hosted
Hosting Vercel✓CDN Vercel✓

Vercel: Hosted on AWS/Google Cloud with renewable energy commitments

Vercel: Hosted on AWS/Google Cloud with renewable energy commitments

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
PASS
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 4 KB (vs 1231 KB first visit). 64 of 65 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.28g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.28g)
First visit
1231 KB
Repeat visit
4 KB

100% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.28g CO2 per returning visitor

64 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
18th percentile
PASS
18th percentile
Info::
0.28g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 82% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 18th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.28g

18th percentile

Cleaner than 82% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 53% cleaner ✓
vs Target 43% cleaner ✓
Image Optimization
33 images, 457 KB total, 141 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

33

Total Size

457 KB

Oversized

11

Wasted

141 KB

20 missing dimensions 14 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback