Skip to content
https://nrc.nl

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
83
GRADE
B
FIX
0
REVIEW
4
PASS
2
INFO
0
Checks
6
2 PASS 4 REVIEW
B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.55g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.55g CO2 per view
Info::
0.55g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.3 MB, producing an estimated 0.55g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.01g, network 0.11g, end-user device 0.42g.
Got: 0.55g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 65.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 65.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 8191 smartphones.
Info::
Green hosting reduces data center emissions

0.55g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 56% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.3 MB

Your site
0.55g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.01g
Network
0.11g
End-user device
0.42g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 5.5 kg · Annual: 65.5 kg · ≈ 8191 smartphone charges
B
Green Hosting
Green (hosting)
REVIEW
Green (hosting)
Info::
Intermax uses renewable energy
Info::
Intermax: Verified by the Green Web Foundation
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green Hosting Green Hosted
Hosting IntermaxCDN Not identified

Intermax: Verified by the Green Web Foundation

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Carbon Budget
44th percentile
REVIEW
44th percentile
Info::
0.55g CO2 — below the median website (0.60g)
Better than an estimated 56% of websites, but above the sustainability target of 0.50g. Reducing page weight would help reach the target.
Info::
Estimated 44th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.55g

44th percentile

Cleaner than 56% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 9% cleaner ✓
vs Target 9% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
78% efficient
REVIEW
78% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 78%
An estimated 515 KB (22%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 515 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.12g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
78% efficient

Total waste: 515 KB (22% of page weight)

Unused JS 515 KB

0.12g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 2362 KB
Theoretical minimum 1847 KB
Potential savings 515 KB (0.12g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 61 KB (vs 2362 KB first visit). 114 of 119 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.53g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.55g)
First visit
2362 KB
Repeat visit
61 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.53g CO2 per returning visitor

114 resources served from cache · 5 resources re-downloaded

A+
Green Hosting
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
PASS

Green Hosting

This site is hosted on green energy infrastructure

Provider: Intermax

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback