Skip to content
https://quickconnect.to

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
86
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
3
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
3 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Transfer Efficiency
80% efficient
REVIEW
80% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 80%
An estimated 53 KB (20%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 53 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.01g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
80% efficient

Total waste: 53 KB (20% of page weight)

Unused JS 53 KB

0.01g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 272 KB
Theoretical minimum 219 KB
Potential savings 53 KB (0.01g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
CO2 Per Page Load
0.08g CO2 per view
PASS
0.08g CO2 per view
Info::
0.08g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 0.3 MB, producing an estimated 0.08g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.01g, network 0.01g, end-user device 0.05g.
Got: 0.08g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 9.1 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 9.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 1131 smartphones.

0.08g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 90% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 0.3 MB

Your site
0.08g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.01g
Network
0.01g
End-user device
0.05g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 0.8 kg · Annual: 9.1 kg · ≈ 1131 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
84% cached
PASS
84% cached
Info::
84% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 44 KB (vs 272 KB first visit). 17 of 18 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.06g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.08g)
First visit
272 KB
Repeat visit
44 KB

84% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.06g CO2 per returning visitor

17 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Carbon Budget
10th percentile
PASS
10th percentile
Info::
0.08g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 90% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 10th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.08g

10th percentile

Cleaner than 90% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 87% cleaner ✓
vs Target 85% cleaner ✓
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback