Audit overview
4 categories need attention: Security, and 3 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
1 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
1 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
NOK 6,975 investment → NOK 77,991/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.
- Page takes 22.9s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 20.4s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 933msClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 1 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundGDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
NOK 77.982 /mo
+31.2pp bounce · ~3,119 lost visitors/mo
CPC: NOK 25.00
Bandwidth Waste
NOK 9,27 /mo
10773.1 MB/mo × 0.860 NOK/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.1 MB per page loadSaves NOK 9,27/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
9.61 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
22.91 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
933 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.096
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
11.47 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
23.38 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.07 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.37 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
22 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.001
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.07 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
4.05 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
1 button(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Technology stack
Liferay, on Apache/Java, hosted on Apache HTTP Server
Stack Architecture
Pusher 
Siteimprove 
Umami 
Liferay 
AlloyUI 
Bootstrap 4.3.1
Font Awesome 
Google Font API Google Search Console 
Lodash 4.17.21
Popper Tablesorter 
Tailwind CSS 
Ubuntu 
YUI patched-v3.18.1
YUI Doc 
core-js 3.46.0
jQuery 3.5.1
Java 
Apache 2.4.52 Apache HTTP Server 2.4.52All Detected Technologies (21)
Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.
Java is a class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.
Liferay is an open-source company that provides free documentation and paid professional service to users of its software.
Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.
Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
Lodash is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.
Popper is a positioning engine, its purpose is to calculate the position of an element to make it possible to position it near a given reference element.
Flexible client-side table sorting.
Ubuntu is a free and open-source operating system on Linux for the enterprise server, desktop, cloud, and IoT.
YUI is a JavaScript and CSS library with more than 30 unique components including low-level DOM utilities and high-level user-interface widgets.
YUI Doc is a Node.js application used at build time to generate API documentation.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Pusher is a platform that enables real-time experiences for mobile and web applications through scalable messaging and data synchronization.
Siteimprove is a digital analytics and content QA platform.
Umami is a self-hosted web analytics solution. It's goal is to provide a friendlier, privacy-focused alternative to Google Analytics and a free, open-sourced alternative to paid solutions.
Observations (4)
Server version exposed in headers
The Server header reveals 'Apache 2.4.52'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.
No build tool detected
A framework (AlloyUI) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Bootstrap version may be outdated
Detected Bootstrap 4.3.1. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Complex technology stack detected
21 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/f47c7b71-e5f1-40ed-b9b4-77695722f459)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/f47c7b71-e5f1-40ed-b9b4-77695722f459"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fntnu.no" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fntnu.noExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (81)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+4Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+5Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 control(s) without accessible label
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found