Skip to content
https://www.pestauthority.com/sioux-falls-sd/

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
83
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
4
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
4 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Transfer Efficiency
78% efficient
REVIEW
78% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 78%
An estimated 296 KB (22%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 296 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.08g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
78% efficient

Total waste: 296 KB (22% of page weight)

Unused JS 296 KB

0.08g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1337 KB
Theoretical minimum 1040 KB
Potential savings 296 KB (0.08g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.37g CO2 per view
PASS
0.37g CO2 per view
Info::
0.37g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.3 MB, producing an estimated 0.37g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.07g, network 0.06g, end-user device 0.24g.
Got: 0.37g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 44.4 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 44.4 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 5547 smartphones.

0.37g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 74% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.3 MB

Your site
0.37g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.07g
Network
0.06g
End-user device
0.24g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 3.7 kg · Annual: 44.4 kg · ≈ 5547 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 37 KB (vs 1337 KB first visit). 66 of 67 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.36g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.37g)
First visit
1337 KB
Repeat visit
37 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.36g CO2 per returning visitor

66 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
26th percentile
PASS
26th percentile
Info::
0.37g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 74% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 26th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.37g

26th percentile

Cleaner than 74% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 38% cleaner ✓
vs Target 26% cleaner ✓
A+
Web Font Weight Variants
4 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
4 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
4 font weight(s) loaded across 1 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
7 images, 57 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

7

Total Size

57 KB

7 missing dimensions 4 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback