https://d3g3kq4d6y6c79.cloudfront.net
Sustainability
· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
80
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
1
Checks
83 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
DGreen HostingActionNot greenFIX
Green Hosting
ActionNot green
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
AWS: Renewable energy varies by region; committed to 100% by 2025
Info::
AWS CloudFront: Renewable varies by edge location
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting AWS✗CDN AWS CloudFront✗
AWS: Renewable energy varies by region; committed to 100% by 2025
AWS CloudFront: Renewable varies by edge location
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
BCarbon Budget36th percentileREVIEW
Carbon Budget
36th percentile
36th percentile
Info::
0.46g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 64% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 36th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.46g
36th percentile
Cleaner than 64% of websites
✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target
vs Median 23% cleaner ✓
vs Target 7% cleaner ✓
BWeb Font Weight VariantsNo detectable Google Fonts weightsREVIEW
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
ACO2 Per Page Load0.46g CO2 per viewPASS
CO2 Per Page Load
0.46g CO2 per view
0.46g CO2 per view
Info::
0.46g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.6 MB, producing an estimated 0.46g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.09g, network 0.08g, end-user device 0.30g.
Got: 0.46g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 55.6 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 55.6 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6947 smartphones.
0.46g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 64% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.6 MB
Your site
0.46g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.09g
Network
0.08g
End-user device
0.30g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.6 kg · Annual: 55.6 kg · ≈ 6947 smartphone charges
A+Repeat Visit Weight99% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 12 KB (vs 1674 KB first visit). 26 of 27 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.46g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.46g)
First visit
1674 KB
Repeat visit
12 KB
99% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.46g CO2 per returning visitor
26 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
A+Transfer Efficiency98% efficientPASS
Transfer Efficiency
98% efficient
98% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 98%
Only 25 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
Total waste: 25 KB (2% of page weight)
Unused JS 25 KB
0.01g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 1674 KB
Theoretical minimum 1649 KB
Potential savings 25 KB (0.01g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
Image Optimization9 images, 1226 KB total, 771 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization
9 images, 1226 KB total, 771 KB wasted
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
9
Total Size
1226 KB
Oversized
4
Wasted
771 KB
8 missing dimensions 1 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.