Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 8.5 MB (5.6 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
3 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
CHF 1,008 investment → CHF 13,846/month returns + CHF 250,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~22%.
- Page takes 9.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 7.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 560ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No skip-to-content linkKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page→ Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
CHF 250’000
- No privacy policy link detectednDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundnDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000
- Trackers detected but no privacy policy foundnDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000
Bounce-Rate Cost
CHF 6’921 /mo
+21.6pp bounce · ~2,163 lost visitors/mo
CPC: CHF 3.20
Bandwidth Waste
CHF 1.25 /mo
17672.0 MB/mo × 0.071 CHF/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.8 MB per page loadSaves CHF 1.25/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
6.56 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
9.73 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
560 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.56 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
14.95 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.68 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.49 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
42 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.92 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.86 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 8.5 MB (5.6 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
3 image(s) missing alt attribute
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 68+ on Accessibility; you're at 44 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Apple sites score 71+ on Accessibility; you're at 44 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Amazon Route 53, on Caddy/Go, hosted on Snowplow Analytics, with cdnjs CDN
Stack Architecture
Chartbeat 
Commanders Act TagCommander 
HTTP/3 Microsoft 365 NS1 
Open Graph 
Priority Hints 
Usercentrics 
VideoJS 7.16.0
jQuery 3.3.1
Go 
Caddy 
Snowplow Analytics All Detected Technologies (17)
Caddy is a Go-based web server known for its simplicity and automatic HTTPS features.
Snowplow is an open-source behavioral data management platform for businesses.
Go is an open source high-level programming language.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Usercentrics is a SaaS enterprise solution for Consent Management (CMP) that helps enterprise customers to obtain, manage and document the user consent.
Video.js is a JavaScript and CSS library that makes it easier to work with and build on HTML5 video.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Chartbeat is a web analytics service that provides real-time data and insights into website performance, audience engagement, and content effectiveness for publishers and media organizations.
Commanders Act TagCommander is a European company providing a tag management product designed to handle website tags.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
17 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/feb9ef82-77f3-4ddf-9d1d-0c6e937b7b70)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/feb9ef82-77f3-4ddf-9d1d-0c6e937b7b70"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Frts.ch" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Frts.chExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 8h total → projected C (79)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 8.5 MB (5.6 MB transferred)
- · HSTS header is missing
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+5Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 3 image(s) missing alt attribute
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found