Skip to content
https://22.cn

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
68
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.14g CO2 per view
FIX
1.14g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.14g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.0 MB, producing an estimated 1.14g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.21g, network 0.20g, end-user device 0.73g.
Got: 1.14g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 137.2 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 137.2 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 17147 smartphones.

1.14g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 35% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.0 MB

Your site
1.14g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.21g
Network
0.20g
End-user device
0.73g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 11.4 kg · Annual: 137.2 kg · ≈ 17147 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Microsoft IISCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
65th percentile
FIX
65th percentile
Warning::
1.14g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 35% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 65th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.14g

65th percentile

Cleaner than 35% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 91% more
vs Target 129% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
94% cached
PASS
94% cached
Info::
94% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 248 KB (vs 4133 KB first visit). 109 of 111 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.07g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.07g CO2 (first visit: 1.14g)
First visit
4133 KB
Repeat visit
248 KB

94% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.07g CO2 per returning visitor

109 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
95% efficient
PASS
95% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 95%
Only 193 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
95% efficient

Total waste: 193 KB (5% of page weight)

Unused JS 193 KB

0.05g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4133 KB
Theoretical minimum 3939 KB
Potential savings 193 KB (0.05g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback