Skip to content
https://agenziawebroma.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
84
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
4
INFO
1
Checks
8
4 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Carbon Budget
33th percentile
REVIEW
33th percentile
Info::
0.44g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 67% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 33th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.44g

33rd percentile

Cleaner than 67% of websites

Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 27% cleaner ✓
vs Target 13% cleaner ✓
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.44g CO2 per view
PASS
0.44g CO2 per view
Info::
0.44g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.5 MB, producing an estimated 0.44g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.08g, network 0.08g, end-user device 0.28g.
Got: 0.44g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 52.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 52.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6560 smartphones.

0.44g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 67% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.5 MB

Your site
0.44g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.08g
Network
0.08g
End-user device
0.28g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.4 kg · Annual: 52.5 kg · ≈ 6560 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 22 KB (vs 1581 KB first visit). 65 of 66 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.43g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.44g)
First visit
1581 KB
Repeat visit
22 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.43g CO2 per returning visitor

65 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
96% efficient
PASS
96% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 96%
Only 70 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
96% efficient

Total waste: 70 KB (4% of page weight)

Unused JS 70 KB

0.02g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1581 KB
Theoretical minimum 1510 KB
Potential savings 70 KB (0.02g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

A+
Web Font Weight Variants
4 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
4 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
4 font weight(s) loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
20 images, 524 KB total, 89 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

20

Total Size

524 KB

Oversized

1

Wasted

89 KB

4 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback