Skip to content
https://ama-assn.org

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
64
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.12g CO2 per view
FIX
1.12g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.12g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 3.9 MB, producing an estimated 1.12g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.21g, network 0.19g, end-user device 0.72g.
Got: 1.12g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 134.1 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 134.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 16757 smartphones.

1.12g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 36% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.9 MB

Your site
1.12g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.21g
Network
0.19g
End-user device
0.72g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 11.2 kg · Annual: 134.1 kg · ≈ 16757 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Amazon Web Services✗CDN Varnish✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
64th percentile
FIX
64th percentile
Warning::
1.12g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 36% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 64th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.12g

64th percentile

Cleaner than 36% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 86% more
vs Target 123% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
76% efficient
REVIEW
76% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 76%
An estimated 953 KB (24%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 953 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.26g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
76% efficient

Total waste: 953 KB (24% of page weight)

Unused JS 953 KB

0.26g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4039 KB
Theoretical minimum 3085 KB
Potential savings 953 KB (0.26g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 64 KB (vs 4039 KB first visit). 360 of 367 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.10g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 1.12g)
First visit
4039 KB
Repeat visit
64 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.10g CO2 per returning visitor

360 resources served from cache · 7 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback